let x, y be Real; ( 0 <= x & x < y implies ex s0 being Real st
( 0 < s0 & x < y / (1 + s0) & y / (1 + s0) < y ) )
assume that
A1:
0 <= x
and
A2:
x < y
; ex s0 being Real st
( 0 < s0 & x < y / (1 + s0) & y / (1 + s0) < y )
ex s0 being Real st
( 0 < s0 & x < y / (1 + s0) & y / (1 + s0) < y )
proof
consider s being
Real such that A3:
x < s
and A4:
s < y
by A2, XREAL_1:5;
now ( ( 0 = x & 0 < s & x < y / (1 + s) & y / (1 + s) < y ) or ( 0 < x & 0 < (s / x) - 1 & x < y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) & y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) < y ) )per cases
( 0 = x or 0 < x )
by A1;
case A6:
0 < x
;
( 0 < (s / x) - 1 & x < y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) & y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) < y )set s0 =
(s / x) - 1;
A7:
(1 + ((s / x) - 1)) " = 1
/ (1 + ((s / x) - 1))
by XCMPLX_1:215;
then A8:
s * ((1 + ((s / x) - 1)) ") = (s * 1) / (1 + ((s / x) - 1))
by XCMPLX_1:74;
(1 + ((s / x) - 1)) * x = (x / x) * s
by XCMPLX_1:75;
then
(1 + ((s / x) - 1)) * x = 1
* s
by A6, XCMPLX_1:60;
then A9:
(((1 + ((s / x) - 1)) ") * (1 + ((s / x) - 1))) * x = s * ((1 + ((s / x) - 1)) ")
;
0 < 1
+ ((s / x) - 1)
by A3, A6, XREAL_1:187;
then A10:
((1 + ((s / x) - 1)) ") * (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) = 1
by A7, XCMPLX_1:106;
A11:
1
< 1
+ ((s / x) - 1)
by A3, A6, XREAL_1:187;
then
y < y * (1 + ((s / x) - 1))
by A1, A2, XREAL_1:155;
hence
(
0 < (s / x) - 1 &
x < y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) &
y / (1 + ((s / x) - 1)) < y )
by A4, A11, A9, A10, A8, XREAL_1:50, XREAL_1:74, XREAL_1:83;
verum end; end; end;
hence
ex
s0 being
Real st
(
0 < s0 &
x < y / (1 + s0) &
y / (1 + s0) < y )
;
verum
end;
hence
ex s0 being Real st
( 0 < s0 & x < y / (1 + s0) & y / (1 + s0) < y )
; verum