let r, x0 be Real; ( 0 < r implies ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} = ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ )
assume A1:
0 < r
; ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} = ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
thus
].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} c= ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
XBOOLE_0:def 10 ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ c= ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}proof
let x be
object ;
TARSKI:def 3 ( not x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} or x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ )
assume A2:
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
;
x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
then consider r1 being
Real such that A3:
r1 = x
;
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[
by A2, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
x in { g2 where g2 is Real : ( x0 - r < g2 & g2 < x0 + r ) }
by RCOMP_1:def 2;
then A4:
ex
g2 being
Real st
(
g2 = x &
x0 - r < g2 &
g2 < x0 + r )
;
not
x in {x0}
by A2, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then A5:
r1 <> x0
by A3, TARSKI:def 1;
hence
x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
;
verum
end;
let x be object ; TARSKI:def 3 ( not x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ or x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} )
assume A6:
x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
; x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
hence
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
; verum