reconsider a = q `3_4 , b = q `4_4 as Element of L ;
set x = q `1_4 ;
set y = q `2_4 ;
defpred S1[ Element of new_set2 A, Element of new_set2 A, set ] means ( ( $1 in A & $2 in A implies $3 = d . ($1,$2) ) & ( ( ( $1 = {A} & $2 = {{A}} ) or ( $2 = {A} & $1 = {{A}} ) ) implies $3 = ((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" a) "/\" b ) & ( ( $1 = {A} or $1 = {{A}} ) & $2 = $1 implies $3 = Bottom L ) & ( $1 in A & $2 = {A} implies ex p9 being Element of A st
( p9 = $1 & $3 = (d . (p9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a ) ) & ( $1 in A & $2 = {{A}} implies ex p9 being Element of A st
( p9 = $1 & $3 = (d . (p9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a ) ) & ( $2 in A & $1 = {A} implies ex q9 being Element of A st
( q9 = $2 & $3 = (d . (q9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a ) ) & ( $2 in A & $1 = {{A}} implies ex q9 being Element of A st
( q9 = $2 & $3 = (d . (q9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a ) ) );
{{A}} in {{A},{{A}}}
by TARSKI:def 2;
then A1:
{{A}} in new_set2 A
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A2:
for p, q being Element of new_set2 A ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]
proof
let p,
q be
Element of
new_set2 A;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]
A3:
(
p in A or
p in {{A},{{A}}} )
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A4:
(
q in A or
q in {{A},{{A}}} )
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A5:
( ( (
p = {A} or
p = {{A}} ) &
p = q ) iff ( (
p = {A} &
q = {A} ) or (
p = {{A}} &
q = {{A}} ) ) )
;
A6:
not
{A} in A
by TARSKI:def 1;
A7:
{A} <> {{A}}
A8:
not
{{A}} in A
per cases
( ( p in A & q in A ) or ( p = {A} & q = {{A}} ) or ( q = {A} & p = {{A}} ) or ( ( p = {A} or p = {{A}} ) & q = p ) or ( p in A & q = {A} ) or ( p in A & q = {{A}} ) or ( q in A & p = {A} ) or ( q in A & p = {{A}} ) )
by A3, A4, A5, TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
(
p in A &
q in A )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]then reconsider p9 =
p,
q9 =
q as
Element of
A ;
take
d . (
p9,
q9)
;
S1[p,q,d . (p9,q9)]thus
S1[
p,
q,
d . (
p9,
q9)]
by A6, A8;
verum end; suppose A10:
( (
p = {A} &
q = {{A}} ) or (
q = {A} &
p = {{A}} ) )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]take
((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" a) "/\" b
;
S1[p,q,((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" a) "/\" b]thus
S1[
p,
q,
((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" a) "/\" b]
by A7, A8, A10, TARSKI:def 1;
verum end; suppose A12:
(
p in A &
q = {A} )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]then reconsider p9 =
p as
Element of
A ;
take
(d . (p9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a
;
S1[p,q,(d . (p9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a]thus
S1[
p,
q,
(d . (p9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a]
by A7, A8, A12, TARSKI:def 1;
verum end; suppose A13:
(
p in A &
q = {{A}} )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]then reconsider p9 =
p as
Element of
A ;
take
(d . (p9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
;
S1[p,q,(d . (p9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a]thus
S1[
p,
q,
(d . (p9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a]
by A7, A8, A13, TARSKI:def 1;
verum end; suppose A14:
(
q in A &
p = {A} )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]then reconsider q9 =
q as
Element of
A ;
take
(d . (q9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a
;
S1[p,q,(d . (q9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a]thus
S1[
p,
q,
(d . (q9,(q `1_4))) "\/" a]
by A7, A8, A14, TARSKI:def 1;
verum end; suppose A15:
(
q in A &
p = {{A}} )
;
ex r being Element of L st S1[p,q,r]then reconsider q9 =
q as
Element of
A ;
take
(d . (q9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
;
S1[p,q,(d . (q9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a]thus
S1[
p,
q,
(d . (q9,(q `2_4))) "\/" a]
by A7, A8, A15, TARSKI:def 1;
verum end; end;
end;
consider f being Function of [:(new_set2 A),(new_set2 A):], the carrier of L such that
A16:
for p, q being Element of new_set2 A holds S1[p,q,f . (p,q)]
from BINOP_1:sch 3(A2);
reconsider f = f as BiFunction of (new_set2 A),L ;
{A} in {{A},{{A}}}
by TARSKI:def 2;
then A17:
{A} in new_set2 A
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A18:
for u being Element of A holds
( f . ({A},u) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a & f . ({{A}},u) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
proof
let u be
Element of
A;
( f . ({A},u) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a & f . ({{A}},u) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
reconsider u9 =
u as
Element of
new_set2 A by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
ex
u1 being
Element of
A st
(
u1 = u9 &
f . (
{A},
u9)
= (d . (u1,(q `1_4))) "\/" a )
by A17, A16;
hence
f . (
{A},
u)
= (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a
;
f . ({{A}},u) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
ex
u2 being
Element of
A st
(
u2 = u9 &
f . (
{{A}},
u9)
= (d . (u2,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
by A1, A16;
hence
f . (
{{A}},
u)
= (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
;
verum
end;
take
f
; ( ( for u, v being Element of A holds f . (u,v) = d . (u,v) ) & f . ({A},{A}) = Bottom L & f . ({{A}},{{A}}) = Bottom L & f . ({A},{{A}}) = ((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4)) "/\" (q `4_4) & f . ({{A}},{A}) = ((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4)) "/\" (q `4_4) & ( for u being Element of A holds
( f . (u,{A}) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . ({A},u) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . (u,{{A}}) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . ({{A}},u) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) ) ) )
A19:
for u, v being Element of A holds f . (u,v) = d . (u,v)
for u being Element of A holds
( f . (u,{A}) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a & f . (u,{{A}}) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
proof
let u be
Element of
A;
( f . (u,{A}) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a & f . (u,{{A}}) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
reconsider u9 =
u as
Element of
new_set2 A by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
ex
u1 being
Element of
A st
(
u1 = u9 &
f . (
u9,
{A})
= (d . (u1,(q `1_4))) "\/" a )
by A17, A16;
hence
f . (
u,
{A})
= (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" a
;
f . (u,{{A}}) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
ex
u2 being
Element of
A st
(
u2 = u9 &
f . (
u9,
{{A}})
= (d . (u2,(q `2_4))) "\/" a )
by A1, A16;
hence
f . (
u,
{{A}})
= (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" a
;
verum
end;
hence
( ( for u, v being Element of A holds f . (u,v) = d . (u,v) ) & f . ({A},{A}) = Bottom L & f . ({{A}},{{A}}) = Bottom L & f . ({A},{{A}}) = ((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4)) "/\" (q `4_4) & f . ({{A}},{A}) = ((d . ((q `1_4),(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4)) "/\" (q `4_4) & ( for u being Element of A holds
( f . (u,{A}) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . ({A},u) = (d . (u,(q `1_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . (u,{{A}}) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) & f . ({{A}},u) = (d . (u,(q `2_4))) "\/" (q `3_4) ) ) )
by A17, A1, A16, A19, A18; verum