let i1, j1, i2, j2 be Nat; for G being Go-board st [i1,j1] in Indices G & [i2,j2] in Indices G & G * (i1,j1) = G * (i2,j2) holds
( i1 = i2 & j1 = j2 )
let G be Go-board; ( [i1,j1] in Indices G & [i2,j2] in Indices G & G * (i1,j1) = G * (i2,j2) implies ( i1 = i2 & j1 = j2 ) )
assume that
A1:
[i1,j1] in Indices G
and
A2:
[i2,j2] in Indices G
and
A3:
G * (i1,j1) = G * (i2,j2)
; ( i1 = i2 & j1 = j2 )
A4:
1 <= i1
by A1, MATRIX_0:32;
A5:
j1 <= width G
by A1, MATRIX_0:32;
A6:
1 <= j1
by A1, MATRIX_0:32;
A7:
1 <= i2
by A2, MATRIX_0:32;
A8:
i1 <= len G
by A1, MATRIX_0:32;
A9:
i2 <= len G
by A2, MATRIX_0:32;
A10:
j2 <= width G
by A2, MATRIX_0:32;
A11:
1 <= j2
by A2, MATRIX_0:32;
then A12: (G * (i1,j2)) `2 =
(G * (1,j2)) `2
by A4, A8, A10, GOBOARD5:1
.=
(G * (i1,j1)) `2
by A3, A7, A9, A11, A10, GOBOARD5:1
;
A13: (G * (i1,j2)) `1 =
(G * (i1,1)) `1
by A4, A8, A11, A10, GOBOARD5:2
.=
(G * (i1,j1)) `1
by A4, A8, A6, A5, GOBOARD5:2
;
assume A14:
( not i1 = i2 or not j1 = j2 )
; contradiction