let p1, p2 be Point of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: for P being non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) st P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & p1 in P & p2 in P & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p2 <> W-min P & p1 `1 >= p2 `1 holds
LE p1,p2,P

let P be non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: ( P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & p1 in P & p2 in P & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p2 <> W-min P & p1 `1 >= p2 `1 implies LE p1,p2,P )
assume that
A1: P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } and
A2: p1 in P and
A3: p2 in P and
A4: p1 `2 <= 0 and
A5: p2 `2 <= 0 and
A6: p2 <> W-min P and
A7: p1 `1 >= p2 `1 ; :: thesis: LE p1,p2,P
A8: Lower_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } by A1, Th35;
then A9: p1 in Lower_Arc P by A2, A4;
set P4 = Lower_Arc P;
A10: P is being_simple_closed_curve by A1, JGRAPH_3:26;
then A11: (Upper_Arc P) /\ (Lower_Arc P) = {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by JORDAN6:def 9;
A12: W-min P = |[(- 1),0]| by A1, Th29;
A13: p2 in Lower_Arc P by A3, A5, A8;
A14: Lower_Arc P is_an_arc_of E-max P, W-min P by A10, JORDAN6:def 9;
for g being Function of I[01],((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P))
for s1, s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = E-max P & g . 1 = W-min P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
s1 <= s2
proof
W-min P in {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A15: W-min P in Lower_Arc P by A11, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
set K0 = Lower_Arc P;
reconsider g0 = proj1 as Function of (TOP-REAL 2),R^1 by TOPMETR:17;
reconsider g2 = g0 | (Lower_Arc P) as Function of ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:9;
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1) = TopSpaceMetr (Closed-Interval-MSpace ((- 1),1)) by TOPMETR:def 7;
then A16: Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1) is T_2 by PCOMPS_1:34;
reconsider g3 = g2 as continuous Function of ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)),(Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) by A1, Lm5;
let g be Function of I[01],((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)); :: thesis: for s1, s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = E-max P & g . 1 = W-min P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
s1 <= s2

let s1, s2 be Real; :: thesis: ( g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = E-max P & g . 1 = W-min P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 implies s1 <= s2 )
assume that
A17: g is being_homeomorphism and
g . 0 = E-max P and
A18: g . 1 = W-min P and
A19: g . s1 = p1 and
A20: ( 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 ) and
A21: g . s2 = p2 and
A22: ( 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 ) ; :: thesis: s1 <= s2
A23: s2 in [.0,1.] by A22, XXREAL_1:1;
reconsider h = g3 * g as Function of (Closed-Interval-TSpace (0,1)),(Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) by TOPMETR:20;
A24: ( dom g3 = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)) & rng g3 = [#] (Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) ) by A1, Lm5, FUNCT_2:def 1;
( g3 is one-to-one & not Lower_Arc P is empty & Lower_Arc P is compact ) by A1, A14, Lm5, JORDAN5A:1;
then g3 is being_homeomorphism by A24, A16, COMPTS_1:17;
then A25: h is being_homeomorphism by A17, TOPMETR:20, TOPS_2:57;
A26: dom g = [#] I[01] by A17, TOPS_2:def 5
.= [.0,1.] by BORSUK_1:40 ;
then A27: 1 in dom g by XXREAL_1:1;
A28: - 1 = |[(- 1),0]| `1 by EUCLID:52
.= proj1 . |[(- 1),0]| by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . |[(- 1),0]| by A12, A15, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . 1 by A12, A18, A27, FUNCT_1:13 ;
A29: s1 in [.0,1.] by A20, XXREAL_1:1;
A30: p2 `1 = g0 . p2 by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . p2 by A13, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . s2 by A21, A26, A23, FUNCT_1:13 ;
p1 `1 = g0 . p1 by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . p1 by A9, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . s1 by A19, A26, A29, FUNCT_1:13 ;
hence s1 <= s2 by A7, A25, A29, A23, A28, A30, Th9; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A31: LE p1,p2, Lower_Arc P, E-max P, W-min P by A9, A13, JORDAN5C:def 3;
( p1 in Lower_Arc P & p2 in Lower_Arc P ) by A2, A3, A4, A5, A8;
hence LE p1,p2,P by A6, A31; :: thesis: verum