let p1, p2 be Point of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: for P being non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) st P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & p1 in P & p2 in P & p1 `2 >= 0 & p2 `2 >= 0 & p1 `1 <= p2 `1 holds
LE p1,p2,P

let P be non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: ( P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & p1 in P & p2 in P & p1 `2 >= 0 & p2 `2 >= 0 & p1 `1 <= p2 `1 implies LE p1,p2,P )
assume that
A1: P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } and
A2: p1 in P and
A3: p2 in P and
A4: p1 `2 >= 0 and
A5: p2 `2 >= 0 and
A6: p1 `1 <= p2 `1 ; :: thesis: LE p1,p2,P
A7: Upper_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 >= 0 ) } by A1, Th34;
then A8: p1 in Upper_Arc P by A2, A4;
A9: p2 in Upper_Arc P by A3, A5, A7;
set P4b = Upper_Arc P;
set P4 = Lower_Arc P;
A10: P is being_simple_closed_curve by A1, JGRAPH_3:26;
then A11: (Upper_Arc P) /\ (Lower_Arc P) = {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by JORDAN6:def 9;
A12: E-max P = |[1,0]| by A1, Th30;
A13: Upper_Arc P is_an_arc_of W-min P, E-max P by A10, JORDAN6:def 8;
for g being Function of I[01],((TOP-REAL 2) | (Upper_Arc P))
for s1, s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = W-min P & g . 1 = E-max P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
s1 <= s2
proof
E-max P in {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A14: E-max P in Upper_Arc P by A11, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
set K0 = Upper_Arc P;
reconsider g0 = proj1 as Function of (TOP-REAL 2),R^1 by TOPMETR:17;
reconsider g2 = g0 | (Upper_Arc P) as Function of ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Upper_Arc P)),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:9;
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1) = TopSpaceMetr (Closed-Interval-MSpace ((- 1),1)) by TOPMETR:def 7;
then A15: Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1) is T_2 by PCOMPS_1:34;
reconsider g3 = g2 as continuous Function of ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Upper_Arc P)),(Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) by A1, Lm6;
let g be Function of I[01],((TOP-REAL 2) | (Upper_Arc P)); :: thesis: for s1, s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = W-min P & g . 1 = E-max P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
s1 <= s2

let s1, s2 be Real; :: thesis: ( g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = W-min P & g . 1 = E-max P & g . s1 = p1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = p2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 implies s1 <= s2 )
assume that
A16: g is being_homeomorphism and
g . 0 = W-min P and
A17: g . 1 = E-max P and
A18: g . s1 = p1 and
A19: ( 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 ) and
A20: g . s2 = p2 and
A21: ( 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 ) ; :: thesis: s1 <= s2
A22: s2 in [.0,1.] by A21, XXREAL_1:1;
reconsider h = g3 * g as Function of (Closed-Interval-TSpace (0,1)),(Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) by TOPMETR:20;
A23: ( dom g3 = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Upper_Arc P)) & rng g3 = [#] (Closed-Interval-TSpace ((- 1),1)) ) by A1, Lm6, FUNCT_2:def 1;
( g3 is one-to-one & not Upper_Arc P is empty & Upper_Arc P is compact ) by A1, A13, Lm6, JORDAN5A:1;
then g3 is being_homeomorphism by A23, A15, COMPTS_1:17;
then A24: h is being_homeomorphism by A16, TOPMETR:20, TOPS_2:57;
A25: dom g = [#] I[01] by A16, TOPS_2:def 5
.= [.0,1.] by BORSUK_1:40 ;
then A26: 1 in dom g by XXREAL_1:1;
A27: 1 = |[1,0]| `1 by EUCLID:52
.= g0 . |[1,0]| by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . |[1,0]| by A12, A14, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . 1 by A12, A17, A26, FUNCT_1:13 ;
A28: s1 in [.0,1.] by A19, XXREAL_1:1;
A29: p2 `1 = g0 . p2 by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . p2 by A9, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . s2 by A20, A25, A22, FUNCT_1:13 ;
p1 `1 = g0 . p1 by PSCOMP_1:def 5
.= g3 . p1 by A8, FUNCT_1:49
.= h . s1 by A18, A25, A28, FUNCT_1:13 ;
hence s1 <= s2 by A6, A24, A28, A22, A27, A29, Th8; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A30: LE p1,p2, Upper_Arc P, W-min P, E-max P by A8, A9, JORDAN5C:def 3;
p1 in Upper_Arc P by A2, A4, A7;
hence LE p1,p2,P by A9, A30; :: thesis: verum