let f be PartFunc of REAL,REAL; for a, b being Real st ].a,b.] c= dom f & f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,b holds
for d being Real st a < d & d <= b holds
( f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,d & ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b)) )
let a, b be Real; ( ].a,b.] c= dom f & f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,b implies for d being Real st a < d & d <= b holds
( f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,d & ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b)) ) )
assume that
A1:
].a,b.] c= dom f
and
A2:
f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,b
; for d being Real st a < d & d <= b holds
( f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,d & ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b)) )
hereby verum
let d be
Real;
( a < d & d <= b implies ( f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,d & ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b)) ) )assume that A3:
a < d
and A4:
d <= b
;
( f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,d & ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b)) )A5:
for
c being
Real st
a < c &
c <= d holds
(
f is_integrable_on ['c,d'] &
f | ['c,d'] is
bounded )
proof
let c be
Real;
( a < c & c <= d implies ( f is_integrable_on ['c,d'] & f | ['c,d'] is bounded ) )
assume A6:
(
a < c &
c <= d )
;
( f is_integrable_on ['c,d'] & f | ['c,d'] is bounded )
then
(
a < c &
c <= b )
by A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then A7:
(
f is_integrable_on ['c,b'] &
f | ['c,b'] is
bounded )
by A2, INTEGR10:def 2;
A8:
(
['c,d'] = [.c,d.] &
['c,b'] = [.c,b.] )
by A6, A4, XXREAL_0:2, INTEGRA5:def 3;
then
['c,b'] c= ].a,b.]
by A6, XXREAL_1:39;
then
['c,b'] c= dom f
by A1;
hence
f is_integrable_on ['c,d']
by A4, A6, A7, INTEGRA6:18;
f | ['c,d'] is bounded
thus
f | ['c,d'] is
bounded
by A7, A8, A4, XXREAL_1:34, RFUNCT_1:74;
verum
end; consider I being
PartFunc of
REAL,
REAL such that A9:
dom I = ].a,b.]
and A10:
for
x being
Real st
x in dom I holds
I . x = integral (
f,
x,
b)
and A11:
I is_right_convergent_in a
by A2, INTEGR10:def 2;
reconsider AB =
].a,d.] as non
empty Subset of
REAL by A3, XXREAL_1:2;
deffunc H1(
Element of
AB)
-> Element of
REAL =
In (
(integral (f,$1,d)),
REAL);
consider Intf being
Function of
AB,
REAL such that A12:
for
x being
Element of
AB holds
Intf . x = H1(
x)
from FUNCT_2:sch 4();
A13:
dom Intf = AB
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then reconsider Intf =
Intf as
PartFunc of
REAL,
REAL by RELSET_1:5;
A14:
for
x being
Real st
x in dom Intf holds
Intf . x = integral (
f,
x,
d)
proof
let x be
Real;
( x in dom Intf implies Intf . x = integral (f,x,d) )
assume
x in dom Intf
;
Intf . x = integral (f,x,d)
then
Intf . x = In (
(integral (f,x,d)),
REAL)
by A12, A13;
hence
Intf . x = integral (
f,
x,
d)
;
verum
end; A15:
for
r being
Real st
a < r holds
ex
g being
Real st
(
g < r &
a < g &
g in dom Intf )
consider G being
Real such that A18:
for
g1 being
Real st
0 < g1 holds
ex
r being
Real st
(
a < r & ( for
r1 being
Real st
r1 < r &
a < r1 &
r1 in dom I holds
|.((I . r1) - G).| < g1 ) )
by A11, LIMFUNC2:10;
set G1 =
G - (integral (f,d,b));
for
g1 being
Real st
0 < g1 holds
ex
r being
Real st
(
a < r & ( for
r1 being
Real st
r1 < r &
a < r1 &
r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1 ) )
proof
let g1 be
Real;
( 0 < g1 implies ex r being Real st
( a < r & ( for r1 being Real st r1 < r & a < r1 & r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1 ) ) )
assume
0 < g1
;
ex r being Real st
( a < r & ( for r1 being Real st r1 < r & a < r1 & r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1 ) )
then consider R being
Real such that A19:
a < R
and A20:
for
r1 being
Real st
r1 < R &
a < r1 &
r1 in dom I holds
|.((I . r1) - G).| < g1
by A18;
take
R
;
( a < R & ( for r1 being Real st r1 < R & a < r1 & r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1 ) )
thus
a < R
by A19;
for r1 being Real st r1 < R & a < r1 & r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1
thus
for
r1 being
Real st
r1 < R &
a < r1 &
r1 in dom Intf holds
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1
verumproof
let r1 be
Real;
( r1 < R & a < r1 & r1 in dom Intf implies |.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1 )
assume that A21:
(
r1 < R &
a < r1 )
and A22:
r1 in dom Intf
;
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1
A23:
r1 <= d
by A13, A22, XXREAL_1:2;
then A24:
r1 <= b
by A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then A25:
r1 in dom I
by A9, A21, XXREAL_1:2;
A26:
f is_integrable_on ['r1,b']
by A21, A24, A2, INTEGR10:def 2;
A27:
f | ['r1,b'] is
bounded
by A21, A24, A2, INTEGR10:def 2;
A28:
['r1,b'] = [.r1,b.]
by A23, A4, XXREAL_0:2, INTEGRA5:def 3;
then
['r1,b'] c= ].a,b.]
by A21, XXREAL_1:39;
then A29:
['r1,b'] c= dom f
by A1;
A30:
d in ['r1,b']
by A4, A28, A23, XXREAL_1:1;
A31:
b in ['r1,b']
by A24, A28, XXREAL_1:1;
Intf . r1 = integral (
f,
r1,
d)
by A14, A22;
then
(Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b))) = ((integral (f,r1,d)) + (integral (f,d,b))) - G
;
then
(Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b))) = (integral (f,r1,b)) - G
by A26, A27, A29, A30, A31, A23, A4, XXREAL_0:2, INTEGRA6:20;
then
(Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b))) = (I . r1) - G
by A21, A10, A24, A9, XXREAL_1:2;
hence
|.((Intf . r1) - (G - (integral (f,d,b)))).| < g1
by A20, A21, A25;
verum
end;
end; hence A32:
f is_left_ext_Riemann_integrable_on a,
d
by A5, A13, A14, A15, LIMFUNC2:10, INTEGR10:def 2;
ext_left_integral (f,a,b) = (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b))
(
f is_integrable_on ['d,b'] &
f | ['d,b'] is
bounded )
by A3, A4, A2, INTEGR10:def 2;
hence
ext_left_integral (
f,
a,
b)
= (ext_left_integral (f,a,d)) + (integral (f,d,b))
by A3, A4, A1, A32, Th20;
verum
end;