set mc = multcomplex ;
consider f being FinSequence of COMPLEX such that
A9: f = F and
A10: Product F = multcomplex $$ f by RVSUM_1:def 13;
set g = [#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex));
defpred S1[ Nat] means multcomplex $$ ((finSeg F),([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex)))) is integer ;
A11: for k being Nat st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
let k be Nat; :: thesis: ( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )
A12: ([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex))) . (k + 1) is integer
proof end;
assume S1[k] ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
then reconsider a = ([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex))) . (k + 1), b = multcomplex $$ ((finSeg k),([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex)))) as Integer by A12;
not k + 1 in Seg k by FINSEQ_3:8;
then multcomplex $$ (((finSeg k) \/ {.(k + 1).}),([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex)))) = multcomplex . ((multcomplex $$ ((finSeg k),([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex))))),(([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex))) . (k + 1))) by SETWOP_2:2
.= b * a by BINOP_2:def 5 ;
hence S1[k + 1] by FINSEQ_1:9; :: thesis: verum
end;
Seg 0 = {}. NAT ;
then A13: S1[ 0 ] by BINOP_2:6, SETWISEO:31;
A14: for n being Nat holds S1[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A13, A11);
consider n being Nat such that
A15: dom f = Seg n by FINSEQ_1:def 2;
A16: multcomplex $$ f = multcomplex $$ ((findom f),([#] (f,(the_unity_wrt multcomplex)))) by SETWOP_2:def 2;
thus Product F is integer by A10, A16, A15, A14; :: thesis: verum