let AFP be AffinPlane; ( AFP is Moufangian implies for K being Subset of AFP
for o, a, b, c, a9, b9, c9 being Element of AFP st K is being_line & o in K & c in K & c9 in K & not a in K & a <> b & LIN o,a,a9 & a,b // a9,b9 & b,c // b9,c9 & a,c // a9,c9 & a,b // K holds
LIN o,b,b9 )
assume A1:
AFP is Moufangian
; for K being Subset of AFP
for o, a, b, c, a9, b9, c9 being Element of AFP st K is being_line & o in K & c in K & c9 in K & not a in K & a <> b & LIN o,a,a9 & a,b // a9,b9 & b,c // b9,c9 & a,c // a9,c9 & a,b // K holds
LIN o,b,b9
thus
for K being Subset of AFP
for o, a, b, c, a9, b9, c9 being Element of AFP st K is being_line & o in K & c in K & c9 in K & not a in K & a <> b & LIN o,a,a9 & a,b // a9,b9 & b,c // b9,c9 & a,c // a9,c9 & a,b // K holds
LIN o,b,b9
verumproof
let K be
Subset of
AFP;
for o, a, b, c, a9, b9, c9 being Element of AFP st K is being_line & o in K & c in K & c9 in K & not a in K & a <> b & LIN o,a,a9 & a,b // a9,b9 & b,c // b9,c9 & a,c // a9,c9 & a,b // K holds
LIN o,b,b9let o,
a,
b,
c,
a9,
b9,
c9 be
Element of
AFP;
( K is being_line & o in K & c in K & c9 in K & not a in K & a <> b & LIN o,a,a9 & a,b // a9,b9 & b,c // b9,c9 & a,c // a9,c9 & a,b // K implies LIN o,b,b9 )
assume that A2:
K is
being_line
and A3:
o in K
and A4:
c in K
and A5:
c9 in K
and A6:
not
a in K
and A7:
a <> b
and A8:
LIN o,
a,
a9
and A9:
a,
b // a9,
b9
and A10:
b,
c // b9,
c9
and A11:
a,
c // a9,
c9
and A12:
a,
b // K
;
LIN o,b,b9
consider P being
Subset of
AFP such that A13:
a9 in P
and A14:
K // P
by A2, AFF_1:49;
A15:
P is
being_line
by A14, AFF_1:36;
set A =
Line (
o,
b);
set C =
Line (
o,
a);
A16:
o in Line (
o,
b)
by AFF_1:15;
A17:
b in Line (
o,
b)
by AFF_1:15;
assume A18:
not
LIN o,
b,
b9
;
contradiction
then
o <> b
by AFF_1:7;
then A19:
Line (
o,
b) is
being_line
by AFF_1:def 3;
A20:
not
b in K
by A6, A12, AFF_1:35;
not
Line (
o,
b)
// P
then consider x being
Element of
AFP such that A21:
x in Line (
o,
b)
and A22:
x in P
by A19, A15, AFF_1:58;
A23:
o in Line (
o,
a)
by AFF_1:15;
a,
b // P
by A12, A14, AFF_1:43;
then
a9,
b9 // P
by A7, A9, AFF_1:32;
then A24:
b9 in P
by A13, A15, AFF_1:23;
then A25:
LIN b9,
x,
b9
by A15, A22, AFF_1:21;
A26:
a in Line (
o,
a)
by AFF_1:15;
A27:
LIN o,
b,
x
by A19, A16, A17, A21, AFF_1:21;
A28:
Line (
o,
a) is
being_line
by A3, A6, AFF_1:def 3;
then A29:
a9 in Line (
o,
a)
by A3, A6, A8, A23, A26, AFF_1:25;
A30:
b9 <> c9
proof
A31:
a9,
c9 // c,
a
by A11, AFF_1:4;
assume A32:
b9 = c9
;
contradiction
then
P = K
by A5, A14, A24, AFF_1:45;
then
a9 = o
by A2, A3, A6, A28, A23, A26, A29, A13, AFF_1:18;
then
b9 = o
by A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A32, A31, AFF_1:48;
hence
contradiction
by A18, AFF_1:7;
verum
end;
A33:
a9 <> b9
proof
assume A34:
a9 = b9
;
contradiction
A35:
now not a9 = c9assume
a9 = c9
;
contradictionthen
b9 = o
by A2, A3, A5, A6, A28, A23, A26, A29, A34, AFF_1:18;
hence
contradiction
by A18, AFF_1:7;
verum end;
(
a,
c // b,
c or
a9 = c9 )
by A10, A11, A34, AFF_1:5;
then
c,
a // c,
b
by A35, AFF_1:4;
then
LIN c,
a,
b
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
LIN a,
c,
b
by AFF_1:6;
then
a,
c // a,
b
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
a,
b // a,
c
by AFF_1:4;
then
a,
c // K
by A7, A12, AFF_1:32;
then
c,
a // K
by AFF_1:34;
hence
contradiction
by A2, A4, A6, AFF_1:23;
verum
end;
A36:
b <> c
by A4, A6, A12, AFF_1:35;
a9,
x // K
by A13, A14, A22, AFF_1:40;
then
b,
c // x,
c9
by A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A8, A11, A12, A27, Lm2;
then
b9,
c9 // x,
c9
by A10, A36, AFF_1:5;
then
c9,
b9 // c9,
x
by AFF_1:4;
then
LIN c9,
b9,
x
by AFF_1:def 1;
then A37:
LIN b9,
x,
c9
by AFF_1:6;
LIN b9,
x,
a9
by A13, A15, A22, A24, AFF_1:21;
then
LIN b9,
c9,
a9
by A18, A27, A37, A25, AFF_1:8;
then
b9,
c9 // b9,
a9
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
b9,
c9 // a9,
b9
by AFF_1:4;
then
b,
c // a9,
b9
by A10, A30, AFF_1:5;
then
a,
b // b,
c
by A9, A33, AFF_1:5;
then
b,
c // K
by A7, A12, AFF_1:32;
then
c,
b // K
by AFF_1:34;
hence
contradiction
by A2, A4, A20, AFF_1:23;
verum
end;