let G be Graph; for vs being FinSequence of the carrier of G
for sc being simple Chain of G st vs is_vertex_seq_of sc holds
for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs )
let vs be FinSequence of the carrier of G; for sc being simple Chain of G st vs is_vertex_seq_of sc holds
for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs )
let sc be simple Chain of G; ( vs is_vertex_seq_of sc implies for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs ) )
assume A1:
vs is_vertex_seq_of sc
; for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs )
consider vs1 being FinSequence of the carrier of G such that
A2:
vs1 is_vertex_seq_of sc
and
A3:
for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs1 & vs1 . n = vs1 . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs1 )
by Def9;
per cases
( len sc <= 2 or 2 < len sc )
;
suppose A4:
len sc <= 2
;
for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs )thus
for
n,
m being
Nat st 1
<= n &
n < m &
m <= len vs &
vs . n = vs . m holds
(
n = 1 &
m = len vs )
verumproof
not not
len sc = 0 & ... & not
len sc = 2
by A4;
per cases then
( len sc = 0 or len sc = 1 or len sc = 2 )
;
suppose A11:
len sc = 2
;
for n, m being Nat st 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m holds
( n = 1 & m = len vs )set v12 =
vs1 /. (1 + 1);
set v2 =
vs /. (1 + 1);
set v11 =
vs1 /. 1;
A12:
sc . 1
joins vs1 /. 1,
vs1 /. (1 + 1)
by A2, A11;
set v1 =
vs /. 1;
sc . 1
joins vs /. 1,
vs /. (1 + 1)
by A1, A11;
then A13:
( (
vs /. 1
= vs1 /. 1 &
vs /. (1 + 1) = vs1 /. (1 + 1) ) or (
vs /. 1
= vs1 /. (1 + 1) &
vs /. (1 + 1) = vs1 /. 1 ) )
by A12;
A14:
len vs = (1 + 1) + 1
by A1, A11;
then A15:
vs /. (1 + 1) = vs . (1 + 1)
by FINSEQ_4:15;
set v3 =
vs /. ((1 + 1) + 1);
set v13 =
vs1 /. ((1 + 1) + 1);
A16:
sc . 2
joins vs1 /. (1 + 1),
vs1 /. ((1 + 1) + 1)
by A2, A11;
sc . 2
joins vs /. (1 + 1),
vs /. ((1 + 1) + 1)
by A1, A11;
then A17:
( (
vs /. (1 + 1) = vs1 /. (1 + 1) &
vs /. ((1 + 1) + 1) = vs1 /. ((1 + 1) + 1) ) or (
vs /. (1 + 1) = vs1 /. ((1 + 1) + 1) &
vs /. ((1 + 1) + 1) = vs1 /. (1 + 1) ) )
by A16;
A18:
len vs1 = (1 + 1) + 1
by A2, A11;
then A19:
vs1 /. 1
= vs1 . 1
by FINSEQ_4:15;
A20:
vs1 /. ((1 + 1) + 1) = vs1 . ((1 + 1) + 1)
by A18, FINSEQ_4:15;
A21:
vs1 /. (1 + 1) = vs1 . (1 + 1)
by A18, FINSEQ_4:15;
let n,
m be
Nat;
( 1 <= n & n < m & m <= len vs & vs . n = vs . m implies ( n = 1 & m = len vs ) )assume that A22:
1
<= n
and A23:
n < m
and A24:
m <= len vs
and A25:
vs . n = vs . m
;
( n = 1 & m = len vs )
n + 1
<= m
by A23, NAT_1:13;
then
n + 1
<= (1 + 1) + 1
by A14, A24, XXREAL_0:2;
then A26:
n <= 1
+ 1
by XREAL_1:6;
A27:
vs /. ((1 + 1) + 1) = vs . ((1 + 1) + 1)
by A14, FINSEQ_4:15;
A28:
vs /. 1
= vs . 1
by A14, FINSEQ_4:15;
thus
(
n = 1 &
m = len vs )
verumproof
per cases
( n = 1 or n = 1 + 1 )
by A22, A26, NAT_1:9;
suppose A31:
n = 1
+ 1
;
( n = 1 & m = len vs )then
(1 + 1) + 1
<= m
by A23, NAT_1:13;
then
m = (1 + 1) + 1
by A14, A24, XXREAL_0:1;
hence
(
n = 1 &
m = len vs )
by A3, A18, A15, A27, A21, A20, A17, A25, A31;
verum end; end;
end; end; end;
end; end; end;