let i1, i2, j1, j2 be Nat; for G1, G2 being Go-board st Values G1 c= Values G2 & 1 <= i1 & i1 <= len G1 & 1 < j1 & j1 <= width G1 & 1 <= i2 & i2 <= len G2 & 1 < j2 & j2 <= width G2 & G1 * (i1,j1) = G2 * (i2,j2) holds
(G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1))) `2 <= (G2 * (i2,(j2 -' 1))) `2
let G1, G2 be Go-board; ( Values G1 c= Values G2 & 1 <= i1 & i1 <= len G1 & 1 < j1 & j1 <= width G1 & 1 <= i2 & i2 <= len G2 & 1 < j2 & j2 <= width G2 & G1 * (i1,j1) = G2 * (i2,j2) implies (G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1))) `2 <= (G2 * (i2,(j2 -' 1))) `2 )
assume that
A1:
Values G1 c= Values G2
and
A2:
( 1 <= i1 & i1 <= len G1 )
and
A3:
1 < j1
and
A4:
j1 <= width G1
and
A5:
( 1 <= i2 & i2 <= len G2 )
and
A6:
1 < j2
and
A7:
j2 <= width G2
and
A8:
G1 * (i1,j1) = G2 * (i2,j2)
; (G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1))) `2 <= (G2 * (i2,(j2 -' 1))) `2
set p = G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1));
A9:
1 <= j1 -' 1
by A3, NAT_D:49;
then A10:
j1 -' 1 < j1
by NAT_D:51;
then
j1 -' 1 < width G1
by A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then
[i1,(j1 -' 1)] in Indices G1
by A2, A9, MATRIX_0:30;
then
G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1)) in { (G1 * (i,j)) where i, j is Nat : [i,j] in Indices G1 }
;
then
G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1)) in Values G1
by MATRIX_0:39;
then
G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1)) in Values G2
by A1;
then
G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1)) in { (G2 * (i,j)) where i, j is Nat : [i,j] in Indices G2 }
by MATRIX_0:39;
then consider i, j being Nat such that
A11:
G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1)) = G2 * (i,j)
and
A12:
[i,j] in Indices G2
;
A13:
1 <= j
by A12, MATRIX_0:32;
A14:
j <= width G2
by A12, MATRIX_0:32;
( 1 <= i & i <= len G2 )
by A12, MATRIX_0:32;
then A15: (G2 * (i,j)) `2 =
(G2 * (1,j)) `2
by A13, A14, GOBOARD5:1
.=
(G2 * (i2,j)) `2
by A5, A13, A14, GOBOARD5:1
;
then A16:
(G2 * (i2,j)) `2 < (G2 * (i2,j2)) `2
by A2, A4, A8, A9, A10, A11, GOBOARD5:4;
1 <= j2 -' 1
by A6, NAT_D:49;
then
j2 -' 1 < j2
by NAT_D:51;
then A18:
j2 -' 1 < width G2
by A7, XXREAL_0:2;
assume A19:
(G2 * (i2,(j2 -' 1))) `2 < (G1 * (i1,(j1 -' 1))) `2
; contradiction
hence
contradiction
by A17, NAT_D:49; verum