let P be _finite non _trivial Path-like _Graph; :: thesis: for v being object
for C being addAdjVertexAll of P,v, Endvertices P st not v in the_Vertices_of P holds
( C is simple & C is Cycle-like )

let v be object ; :: thesis: for C being addAdjVertexAll of P,v, Endvertices P st not v in the_Vertices_of P holds
( C is simple & C is Cycle-like )

let C be addAdjVertexAll of P,v, Endvertices P; :: thesis: ( not v in the_Vertices_of P implies ( C is simple & C is Cycle-like ) )
assume A1: not v in the_Vertices_of P ; :: thesis: ( C is simple & C is Cycle-like )
thus C is simple ; :: thesis: C is Cycle-like
card (Endvertices P) <> 0 by Th37;
then Endvertices P <> {} ;
hence C is connected ; :: according to GLPACY00:def 6 :: thesis: ( not C is acyclic & C is 2 -regular )
consider w1, w2 being Vertex of P such that
A2: ( w1 <> w2 & Endvertices P = {w1,w2} ) by Th36;
ex G3 being Component of P ex w1, w2 being Vertex of G3 st
( w1 in Endvertices P & w2 in Endvertices P & w1 <> w2 )
proof
reconsider G3 = P as Component of P by GLIB_002:30;
reconsider w1 = w1, w2 = w2 as Vertex of G3 ;
take G3 ; :: thesis: ex w1, w2 being Vertex of G3 st
( w1 in Endvertices P & w2 in Endvertices P & w1 <> w2 )

take w1 ; :: thesis: ex w2 being Vertex of G3 st
( w1 in Endvertices P & w2 in Endvertices P & w1 <> w2 )

take w2 ; :: thesis: ( w1 in Endvertices P & w2 in Endvertices P & w1 <> w2 )
thus ( w1 in Endvertices P & w2 in Endvertices P & w1 <> w2 ) by A2, TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence not C is acyclic by A1, GLIB_007:71; :: thesis: C is 2 -regular
now :: thesis: for u being Vertex of C holds u .degree() = 2end;
hence C is 2 -regular by GLIB_016:def 4; :: thesis: verum