let F be non empty Graph-yielding Function; :: thesis: for x, y being Element of dom F holds [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] misses the_Vertices_of (F . y)
let x, y be Element of dom F; :: thesis: [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] misses the_Vertices_of (F . y)
[:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)) = {}
proof
assume A1: [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)) <> {} ; :: thesis: contradiction
set z = the Element of [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y));
A2: ( the Element of [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)) in [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] & the Element of [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)) in the_Vertices_of (F . y) ) by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then consider a, b being object such that
A3: ( a in {[(the_Vertices_of F),x]} & b in (the_Vertices_of F) . x & the Element of [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)) = [a,b] ) by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A4: a = [(the_Vertices_of F),x] by A3, TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider Z = the Element of [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] /\ (the_Vertices_of (F . y)), A = a, M = [y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))] as set by TARSKI:1;
A5: the_Vertices_of (F . y) in {y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))} by TARSKI:def 2;
{y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))} in {{y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))},{y}} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A6: {y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))} in M by TARSKI:def 5;
A7: the_Vertices_of (F . y) = (the_Vertices_of F) . y by Def8;
dom F = dom (the_Vertices_of F) by Def4;
then A8: [y,(the_Vertices_of (F . y))] in the_Vertices_of F by A7, FUNCT_1:1;
A9: the_Vertices_of F in {(the_Vertices_of F)} by TARSKI:def 1;
{(the_Vertices_of F)} in {{(the_Vertices_of F),x},{(the_Vertices_of F)}} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A10: {(the_Vertices_of F)} in A by A4, TARSKI:def 5;
A11: a in {a} by A3, A4;
{a} in {{a,b},{a}} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A12: {a} in Z by A3, TARSKI:def 5;
thus contradiction by A2, A5, A6, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, GLIBPRE1:2; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence [:{[(the_Vertices_of F),x]},((the_Vertices_of F) . x):] misses the_Vertices_of (F . y) by XBOOLE_0:def 7; :: thesis: verum