let G2 be _Graph; :: thesis: for G1 being Supergraph of G2
for x, y being set
for e being object holds
( ( e Joins x,y,G2 implies e Joins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DJoins x,y,G2 implies e DJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e SJoins x,y,G2 implies e SJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DSJoins x,y,G2 implies e DSJoins x,y,G1 ) )
let G1 be Supergraph of G2; :: thesis: for x, y being set
for e being object holds
( ( e Joins x,y,G2 implies e Joins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DJoins x,y,G2 implies e DJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e SJoins x,y,G2 implies e SJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DSJoins x,y,G2 implies e DSJoins x,y,G1 ) )
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: for e being object holds
( ( e Joins x,y,G2 implies e Joins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DJoins x,y,G2 implies e DJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e SJoins x,y,G2 implies e SJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DSJoins x,y,G2 implies e DSJoins x,y,G1 ) )
let e be object ; :: thesis: ( ( e Joins x,y,G2 implies e Joins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DJoins x,y,G2 implies e DJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e SJoins x,y,G2 implies e SJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DSJoins x,y,G2 implies e DSJoins x,y,G1 ) )
G2 is Subgraph of G1 by Th61;
hence ( ( e Joins x,y,G2 implies e Joins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DJoins x,y,G2 implies e DJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e SJoins x,y,G2 implies e SJoins x,y,G1 ) & ( e DSJoins x,y,G2 implies e DSJoins x,y,G1 ) ) by GLIB_000:72; :: thesis: verum