let G1, G2 be _Graph; :: thesis: for V, E being set
for G3 being inducedSubgraph of G1,V,E st G1 == G2 holds
G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,E

let V, E be set ; :: thesis: for G3 being inducedSubgraph of G1,V,E st G1 == G2 holds
G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,E

let G3 be inducedSubgraph of G1,V,E; :: thesis: ( G1 == G2 implies G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,E )
assume A1: G1 == G2 ; :: thesis: G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,E
now :: thesis: G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,Eend;
hence G3 is inducedSubgraph of G2,V,E ; :: thesis: verum