let R be Relation; for n being Nat st rng R c= dom R holds
( dom (iter (R,n)) = dom R & rng (iter (R,n)) c= dom R )
let n be Nat; ( rng R c= dom R implies ( dom (iter (R,n)) = dom R & rng (iter (R,n)) c= dom R ) )
defpred S1[ Nat] means ( dom (iter (R,$1)) = dom R & rng (iter (R,$1)) c= dom R );
A1:
for k being Nat st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
let k be
Nat;
( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )
assume A2:
(
dom (iter (R,k)) = dom R &
rng (iter (R,k)) c= dom R )
;
S1[k + 1]
iter (
R,
(k + 1))
= R * (iter (R,k))
by Th68;
then A3:
rng (iter (R,(k + 1))) c= rng (iter (R,k))
by RELAT_1:26;
iter (
R,
(k + 1))
= (iter (R,k)) * R
by Th70;
hence
S1[
k + 1]
by A2, A3, RELAT_1:27, XBOOLE_1:1;
verum
end;
assume
rng R c= dom R
; ( dom (iter (R,n)) = dom R & rng (iter (R,n)) c= dom R )
then
iter (R,0) = id (dom R)
by Lm4;
then A4:
S1[ 0 ]
;
for k being Nat holds S1[k]
from NAT_1:sch 2(A4, A1);
hence
( dom (iter (R,n)) = dom R & rng (iter (R,n)) c= dom R )
; verum