let p, q be FinSequence; ( ( rng p misses rng q & p is one-to-one & q is one-to-one ) iff p ^ q is one-to-one )
thus
( rng p misses rng q & p is one-to-one & q is one-to-one implies p ^ q is one-to-one )
( p ^ q is one-to-one implies ( rng p misses rng q & p is one-to-one & q is one-to-one ) )proof
assume that A1:
rng p misses rng q
and A2:
p is
one-to-one
and A3:
q is
one-to-one
;
p ^ q is one-to-one
let x,
y be
object ;
FUNCT_1:def 4 ( not x in dom (p ^ q) or not y in dom (p ^ q) or not (p ^ q) . x = (p ^ q) . y or x = y )
assume that A4:
x in dom (p ^ q)
and A5:
y in dom (p ^ q)
and A6:
(p ^ q) . x = (p ^ q) . y
;
x = y
reconsider k1 =
x,
k2 =
y as
Element of
NAT by A4, A5;
now x = yper cases
( ( k1 in dom p & k2 in dom p ) or ( k1 in dom p & ex n being Nat st
( n in dom q & k2 = (len p) + n ) ) or ( k2 in dom p & ex n being Nat st
( n in dom q & k1 = (len p) + n ) ) or ( ex n being Nat st
( n in dom q & k1 = (len p) + n ) & ex n being Nat st
( n in dom q & k2 = (len p) + n ) ) )
by A4, A5, FINSEQ_1:25;
suppose A19:
( ex
n being
Nat st
(
n in dom q &
k1 = (len p) + n ) & ex
n being
Nat st
(
n in dom q &
k2 = (len p) + n ) )
;
x = ythen consider n2 being
Nat such that A20:
n2 in dom q
and A21:
k2 = (len p) + n2
;
A22:
(p ^ q) . k2 = q . n2
by A20, A21, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
consider n1 being
Nat such that A23:
n1 in dom q
and A24:
k1 = (len p) + n1
by A19;
(p ^ q) . k1 = q . n1
by A23, A24, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence
x = y
by A3, A6, A23, A24, A20, A21, A22;
verum end; end; end;
hence
x = y
;
verum
end;
assume A25:
p ^ q is one-to-one
; ( rng p misses rng q & p is one-to-one & q is one-to-one )
thus
rng p misses rng q
( p is one-to-one & q is one-to-one )proof
assume
not
rng p misses rng q
;
contradiction
then consider x being
object such that A26:
x in rng p
and A27:
x in rng q
by XBOOLE_0:3;
consider y1 being
object such that A28:
y1 in dom p
and A29:
p . y1 = x
by A26, FUNCT_1:def 3;
A30:
y1 in Seg (len p)
by A28, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
consider y2 being
object such that A31:
y2 in dom q
and A32:
q . y2 = x
by A27, FUNCT_1:def 3;
A33:
y2 in Seg (len q)
by A31, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider y1 =
y1,
y2 =
y2 as
Element of
NAT by A28, A31;
A34:
(len p) + y2 in dom (p ^ q)
by A31, FINSEQ_1:28;
A35:
(p ^ q) . y1 = p . y1
by A28, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A36:
(p ^ q) . ((len p) + y2) = q . y2
by A31, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
y1 in dom (p ^ q)
by A28, Th22;
then A37:
y1 = (len p) + y2
by A25, A29, A32, A34, A35, A36;
A38:
y1 = y1 + 0
;
A39:
len p <= (len p) + y2
by NAT_1:12;
y1 <= len p
by A30, FINSEQ_1:1;
then
y1 = len p
by A37, A39, XXREAL_0:1;
hence
contradiction
by A33, A37, A38, FINSEQ_1:1;
verum
end;
thus
p is one-to-one
q is one-to-one proof
let x,
y be
object ;
FUNCT_1:def 4 ( not x in dom p or not y in dom p or not p . x = p . y or x = y )
assume that A40:
x in dom p
and A41:
y in dom p
and A42:
p . x = p . y
;
x = y
reconsider k =
x,
l =
y as
Element of
NAT by A40, A41;
A43:
(p ^ q) . k = p . k
by A40, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A44:
(p ^ q) . l = p . l
by A41, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A45:
l in dom (p ^ q)
by A41, Th22;
k in dom (p ^ q)
by A40, Th22;
hence
x = y
by A25, A42, A43, A44, A45;
verum
end;
let x, y be object ; FUNCT_1:def 4 ( not x in dom q or not y in dom q or not q . x = q . y or x = y )
assume that
A46:
x in dom q
and
A47:
y in dom q
and
A48:
q . x = q . y
; x = y
consider l being Nat such that
A49:
y = l
and
A50:
(len p) + l in dom (p ^ q)
by A47, FINSEQ_1:27;
A51:
(p ^ q) . ((len p) + l) = q . l
by A47, A49, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
consider k being Nat such that
A52:
x = k
and
A53:
(len p) + k in dom (p ^ q)
by A46, FINSEQ_1:27;
(p ^ q) . ((len p) + k) = q . k
by A46, A52, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
then
(len p) + k = (len p) + l
by A25, A48, A52, A53, A49, A50, A51;
hence
x = y
by A52, A49; verum