let A be set ; for a, b, c being object st <*a,b,c*> in 3 -tuples_on A holds
( a in A & b in A & c in A )
let a, b, c be object ; ( <*a,b,c*> in 3 -tuples_on A implies ( a in A & b in A & c in A ) )
A1:
<*a,b,c*> . 3 = c
;
assume
<*a,b,c*> in 3 -tuples_on A
; ( a in A & b in A & c in A )
then A2:
ex a9, b9, c9 being object st
( a9 in A & b9 in A & c9 in A & <*a,b,c*> = <*a9,b9,c9*> )
by Th137;
( <*a,b,c*> . 1 = a & <*a,b,c*> . 2 = b )
;
hence
( a in A & b in A & c in A )
by A2, A1, FINSEQ_1:45; verum