reconsider n = n as Element of NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
set f = (1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R));
set q = (0_. R) +* ((1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R)));
A2:
dom ((1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R))) = {1,n}
by FUNCT_4:62;
for u being object st u in {1,n} holds
u in NAT
by ORDINAL1:def 12;
then
(dom (0_. R)) \/ (dom ((1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R)))) = NAT
by A2, TARSKI:def 3, XBOOLE_1:12;
then
dom ((0_. R) +* ((1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R)))) = NAT
by FUNCT_4:def 1;
hence
(0_. R) +* ((1,n) --> ((- (1. R)),(1. R))) is sequence of R
by A5, FUNCT_2:3; verum