let N be non empty with_zero set ; for S being non empty with_non-empty_values IC-Ins-separated halting AMI-Struct over N
for p being NAT -defined the InstructionsF of b1 -valued non halt-free Function
for d being FinPartState of S holds
( d is Autonomy of p iff p,d computes {} .--> {} )
let S be non empty with_non-empty_values IC-Ins-separated halting AMI-Struct over N; for p being NAT -defined the InstructionsF of S -valued non halt-free Function
for d being FinPartState of S holds
( d is Autonomy of p iff p,d computes {} .--> {} )
let p be NAT -defined the InstructionsF of S -valued non halt-free Function; for d being FinPartState of S holds
( d is Autonomy of p iff p,d computes {} .--> {} )
let d be FinPartState of S; ( d is Autonomy of p iff p,d computes {} .--> {} )
thus
( d is Autonomy of p implies p,d computes {} .--> {} )
( p,d computes {} .--> {} implies d is Autonomy of p )proof
assume A2:
d is
Autonomy of
p
;
p,d computes {} .--> {}
let x be
set ;
EXTPRO_1:def 14 ( x in dom ({} .--> {}) implies ex s being FinPartState of S st
( x = s & d +* s is Autonomy of p & ({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s)) ) )
assume A3:
x in dom ({} .--> {})
;
ex s being FinPartState of S st
( x = s & d +* s is Autonomy of p & ({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s)) )
then
x = {}
by TARSKI:def 1;
then reconsider s =
x as
FinPartState of
S by FUNCT_1:104, RELAT_1:171;
take
s
;
( x = s & d +* s is Autonomy of p & ({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s)) )
A5:
d +* {} = d
;
thus
x = s
;
( d +* s is Autonomy of p & ({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s)) )
thus
d +* s is
Autonomy of
p
by A2, A3, A5, TARSKI:def 1;
({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s))
({} .--> {}) . s = {}
;
hence
({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (
p,
(d +* s))
by XBOOLE_1:2;
verum
end;
A6:
{} in dom ({} .--> {})
by TARSKI:def 1;
assume
p,d computes {} .--> {}
; d is Autonomy of p
then
ex s being FinPartState of S st
( {} = s & d +* s is Autonomy of p & ({} .--> {}) . s c= Result (p,(d +* s)) )
by A6;
hence
d is Autonomy of p
; verum