let n be Nat; :: thesis: for r being Real st r is irrational holds
0 < (scf r) . (n + 1)

let r be Real; :: thesis: ( r is irrational implies 0 < (scf r) . (n + 1) )
assume A1: r is irrational ; :: thesis: 0 < (scf r) . (n + 1)
A2: ((rfs r) . (n + 1)) - 1 > 1 - 1 by A1, Th4, XREAL_1:14;
(rfs r) . (n + 1) < ((scf r) . (n + 1)) + 1 by A1, Th4;
then ((rfs r) . (n + 1)) - 1 < (((scf r) . (n + 1)) + 1) - 1 by XREAL_1:14;
hence 0 < (scf r) . (n + 1) by A2; :: thesis: verum