let f1 be without-infty Function of [:NAT,NAT:],ExtREAL; for f2 being Function of [:NAT,NAT:],ExtREAL
for c being Real st 0 <= c & ( for n, m being Nat holds f2 . (n,m) = c * (f1 . (n,m)) ) holds
( sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1)) & f2 is without-infty )
let f2 be Function of [:NAT,NAT:],ExtREAL; for c being Real st 0 <= c & ( for n, m being Nat holds f2 . (n,m) = c * (f1 . (n,m)) ) holds
( sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1)) & f2 is without-infty )
let c be Real; ( 0 <= c & ( for n, m being Nat holds f2 . (n,m) = c * (f1 . (n,m)) ) implies ( sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1)) & f2 is without-infty ) )
assume that
A1:
0 <= c
and
A3:
for n, m being Nat holds f2 . (n,m) = c * (f1 . (n,m))
; ( sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1)) & f2 is without-infty )
A6:
( dom f1 = [:NAT,NAT:] & dom f2 = [:NAT,NAT:] )
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
C6:
now not -infty in rng f2assume
-infty in rng f2
;
contradictionthen consider z being
object such that C1:
(
z in dom f2 &
-infty = f2 . z )
by FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider n,
m being
object such that C2:
(
n in NAT &
m in NAT &
z = [n,m] )
by C1, ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider n =
n,
m =
m as
Element of
NAT by C2;
f2 . (
n,
m)
= -infty
by C1, C2;
then C3:
c * (f1 . (n,m)) = -infty
by A3;
then C4:
(
f1 . (
n,
m)
= -infty or
f1 . (
n,
m)
= +infty )
by XXREAL_3:70;
z in [:NAT,NAT:]
by C1;
then
[n,m] in dom f1
by C2, FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
-infty in rng f1
by A1, C3, C4, FUNCT_1:3;
hence
contradiction
by MESFUNC5:def 3;
verum end;
then C6a:
f2 is without-infty
by MESFUNC5:def 3;
now sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))per cases
( sup (rng f1) in REAL or sup (rng f1) = +infty )
by Lm8;
suppose A4:
sup (rng f1) in REAL
;
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))A5:
for
y being
UpperBound of
rng f2 holds
c * (sup (rng f1)) <= y
proof
let y be
UpperBound of
rng f2;
c * (sup (rng f1)) <= y
reconsider y =
y as
R_eal by XXREAL_0:def 1;
per cases
( c = 0 or c <> 0 )
;
suppose A10:
c <> 0
;
c * (sup (rng f1)) <= ynow for x being ExtReal st x in rng f1 holds
x <= y / clet x be
ExtReal;
( x in rng f1 implies x <= y / c )assume
x in rng f1
;
x <= y / cthen consider z being
object such that A11:
(
z in dom f1 &
x = f1 . z )
by FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider n,
m being
object such that A12:
(
n in NAT &
m in NAT &
z = [n,m] )
by A11, ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider n =
n,
m =
m as
Element of
NAT by A12;
A14:
f2 . (
n,
m)
in rng f2
by A11, A12, A6, FUNCT_1:3;
f2 . (
n,
m)
= c * (f1 . (n,m))
by A3;
then
(c * (f1 . (n,m))) / c <= y / c
by A1, A10, A14, XXREAL_2:def 1, XXREAL_3:79;
hence
x <= y / c
by A10, A11, A12, XXREAL_3:88;
verum end; then B14:
y / c is
UpperBound of
rng f1
by XXREAL_2:def 1;
A15:
now not y = -infty assume A16:
y = -infty
;
contradictionA17:
[1,1] in [:NAT,NAT:]
by ZFMISC_1:87;
then
f2 . (1,1)
in rng f2
by A6, FUNCT_1:3;
then
f2 . (1,1)
= -infty
by A16, XXREAL_0:6, XXREAL_2:def 1;
then A19:
c * (f1 . (1,1)) = -infty
by A3;
f1 . (1,1)
<= sup (rng f1)
by A6, A17, FUNCT_1:3, XXREAL_2:4;
then A20:
f1 . (1,1)
< +infty
by A4, XXREAL_0:2, XXREAL_0:9;
A21:
not
-infty in rng f1
by MESFUNC5:def 3;
f1 . (1,1)
in rng f1
by A6, A17, FUNCT_1:3;
hence
contradiction
by A19, A20, A21, XXREAL_3:70;
verum end; end; end;
end; now for x being ExtReal st x in rng f2 holds
x <= c * (sup (rng f1))let x be
ExtReal;
( x in rng f2 implies x <= c * (sup (rng f1)) )assume
x in rng f2
;
x <= c * (sup (rng f1))then consider z2 being
object such that A22:
(
z2 in dom f2 &
x = f2 . z2 )
by FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider n2,
m2 being
object such that A23:
(
n2 in NAT &
m2 in NAT &
z2 = [n2,m2] )
by A22, ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider n2 =
n2,
m2 =
m2 as
Element of
NAT by A23;
A24:
sup (rng f1) is
UpperBound of
rng f1
by XXREAL_2:def 3;
[n2,m2] in dom f1
by A6, ZFMISC_1:87;
then A25:
f1 . (
n2,
m2)
<= sup (rng f1)
by A24, XXREAL_2:def 1, FUNCT_1:3;
x = f2 . (
n2,
m2)
by A22, A23;
then
x = c * (f1 . (n2,m2))
by A3;
hence
x <= c * (sup (rng f1))
by A1, A25, XXREAL_3:71;
verum end; then
c * (sup (rng f1)) is
UpperBound of
rng f2
by XXREAL_2:def 1;
hence
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))
by A5, XXREAL_2:def 3;
verum end; suppose A30:
sup (rng f1) = +infty
;
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))per cases
( c = 0 or c <> 0 )
;
suppose A29:
c <> 0
;
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))A34:
now for k being Real st 0 < k holds
ex n, m being Nat st not f2 . (n,m) <= klet k be
Real;
( 0 < k implies ex n, m being Nat st not f2 . (n,m) <= k )reconsider k1 =
k as
Real ;
assume C5:
0 < k
;
not for n, m being Nat holds f2 . (n,m) <= kthen consider n,
m being
Nat such that A31:
k / c < f1 . (
n,
m)
by A1, A29, A30, Th101;
C10:
f2 . (
n,
m)
= c * (f1 . (n,m))
by A3;
(
n in NAT &
m in NAT )
by ORDINAL1:def 12;
then
[n,m] in dom f2
by A6, ZFMISC_1:87;
then C3:
f2 . (
n,
m)
<> -infty
by C6, FUNCT_1:3;
now k < f2 . (n,m)per cases
( f2 . (n,m) in REAL or f2 . (n,m) = +infty )
by C3, XXREAL_0:14;
suppose C7:
f2 . (
n,
m)
in REAL
;
k < f2 . (n,m)
(
f1 . (
n,
m)
> 0 &
0 >= -infty )
by A1, C5, A31;
then C9:
(
f1 . (
n,
m)
in REAL or
f1 . (
n,
m)
= +infty )
by XXREAL_0:14;
then reconsider ES1 =
f1 . (
n,
m) as
Real by C9;
k < c * ES1
by A1, A29, A31, XREAL_1:77;
hence
k < f2 . (
n,
m)
by C10, XXREAL_3:def 5;
verum end; end; end; hence
not for
n,
m being
Nat holds
f2 . (
n,
m)
<= k
;
verum end;
c * (sup (rng f1)) = +infty
by A1, A29, A30, XXREAL_3:def 5;
hence
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))
by C6a, A34, Th101;
verum end; end; end; end; end;
hence
sup (rng f2) = c * (sup (rng f1))
; f2 is without-infty
thus
f2 is without-infty
by C6, MESFUNC5:def 3; verum