let X be AffinPlane; :: thesis: ( X is satisfying_minor_indirect_Scherungssatz implies X is satisfying_minor_Scherungssatz )
assume A1: X is satisfying_minor_indirect_Scherungssatz ; :: thesis: X is satisfying_minor_Scherungssatz
now :: thesis: for a1, a2, a3, a4, b1, b2, b3, b4 being Element of X
for M, N being Subset of X st M // N & a1 in M & a3 in M & b1 in M & b3 in M & a2 in N & a4 in N & b2 in N & b4 in N & not a4 in M & not a2 in M & not b2 in M & not b4 in M & not a1 in N & not a3 in N & not b1 in N & not b3 in N & a3,a2 // b3,b2 & a2,a1 // b2,b1 & a1,a4 // b1,b4 holds
a3,a4 // b3,b4
let a1, a2, a3, a4, b1, b2, b3, b4 be Element of X; :: thesis: for M, N being Subset of X st M // N & a1 in M & a3 in M & b1 in M & b3 in M & a2 in N & a4 in N & b2 in N & b4 in N & not a4 in M & not a2 in M & not b2 in M & not b4 in M & not a1 in N & not a3 in N & not b1 in N & not b3 in N & a3,a2 // b3,b2 & a2,a1 // b2,b1 & a1,a4 // b1,b4 holds
a3,a4 // b3,b4

let M, N be Subset of X; :: thesis: ( M // N & a1 in M & a3 in M & b1 in M & b3 in M & a2 in N & a4 in N & b2 in N & b4 in N & not a4 in M & not a2 in M & not b2 in M & not b4 in M & not a1 in N & not a3 in N & not b1 in N & not b3 in N & a3,a2 // b3,b2 & a2,a1 // b2,b1 & a1,a4 // b1,b4 implies a3,a4 // b3,b4 )
assume that
A2: M // N and
A3: a1 in M and
A4: a3 in M and
A5: b1 in M and
A6: b3 in M and
A7: a2 in N and
A8: a4 in N and
A9: b2 in N and
A10: b4 in N and
A11: not a4 in M and
A12: not a2 in M and
A13: not b2 in M and
A14: not b4 in M and
A15: not a1 in N and
A16: not a3 in N and
A17: not b1 in N and
A18: not b3 in N and
A19: a3,a2 // b3,b2 and
A20: a2,a1 // b2,b1 and
A21: a1,a4 // b1,b4 ; :: thesis: a3,a4 // b3,b4
A22: N is being_line by A2, AFF_1:36;
then consider d1 being Element of X such that
a2 <> d1 and
A23: d1 in N by AFF_1:20;
A24: not d1 in M by A2, A8, A11, A23, AFF_1:45;
A25: M is being_line by A2, AFF_1:36;
ex d2 being Element of X st
( d2 in M & a2,a1 // d2,d1 )
proof
consider e1 being Element of X such that
A26: a1 <> e1 and
A27: e1 in M by A25, AFF_1:20;
consider e2 being Element of X such that
A28: a2,a1 // d1,e2 and
A29: d1 <> e2 by DIRAF:40;
not a1,e1 // d1,e2
proof
assume a1,e1 // d1,e2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then a1,e1 // a2,a1 by A28, A29, AFF_1:5;
then a1,e1 // a1,a2 by AFF_1:4;
then LIN a1,e1,a2 by AFF_1:def 1;
hence contradiction by A3, A12, A25, A26, A27, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d2 being Element of X such that
A30: LIN a1,e1,d2 and
A31: LIN d1,e2,d2 by AFF_1:60;
take d2 ; :: thesis: ( d2 in M & a2,a1 // d2,d1 )
d1,e2 // d1,d2 by A31, AFF_1:def 1;
then a2,a1 // d1,d2 by A28, A29, AFF_1:5;
hence ( d2 in M & a2,a1 // d2,d1 ) by A3, A25, A26, A27, A30, AFF_1:4, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d2 being Element of X such that
A32: d2 in M and
A33: a2,a1 // d2,d1 ;
A34: not d2 in N by A2, A8, A11, A32, AFF_1:45;
ex d3 being Element of X st
( d3 in N & a3,a2 // d3,d2 )
proof
consider e1 being Element of X such that
A35: a2 <> e1 and
A36: e1 in N by A22, AFF_1:20;
consider e2 being Element of X such that
A37: a3,a2 // d2,e2 and
A38: d2 <> e2 by DIRAF:40;
not a2,e1 // d2,e2
proof
assume a2,e1 // d2,e2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then a2,e1 // a3,a2 by A37, A38, AFF_1:5;
then a2,e1 // a2,a3 by AFF_1:4;
then LIN a2,e1,a3 by AFF_1:def 1;
hence contradiction by A7, A16, A22, A35, A36, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d3 being Element of X such that
A39: LIN a2,e1,d3 and
A40: LIN d2,e2,d3 by AFF_1:60;
take d3 ; :: thesis: ( d3 in N & a3,a2 // d3,d2 )
d2,e2 // d2,d3 by A40, AFF_1:def 1;
then a3,a2 // d2,d3 by A37, A38, AFF_1:5;
hence ( d3 in N & a3,a2 // d3,d2 ) by A7, A22, A35, A36, A39, AFF_1:4, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d3 being Element of X such that
A41: d3 in N and
A42: a3,a2 // d3,d2 ;
A43: not d3 in M by A2, A8, A11, A41, AFF_1:45;
ex d4 being Element of X st
( d4 in M & a1,a4 // d1,d4 )
proof
consider e1 being Element of X such that
A44: a1 <> e1 and
A45: e1 in M by A25, AFF_1:20;
consider e2 being Element of X such that
A46: a1,a4 // d1,e2 and
A47: d1 <> e2 by DIRAF:40;
not a1,e1 // d1,e2
proof
assume a1,e1 // d1,e2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then a1,e1 // a1,a4 by A46, A47, AFF_1:5;
then LIN a1,e1,a4 by AFF_1:def 1;
hence contradiction by A3, A11, A25, A44, A45, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d4 being Element of X such that
A48: LIN a1,e1,d4 and
A49: LIN d1,e2,d4 by AFF_1:60;
take d4 ; :: thesis: ( d4 in M & a1,a4 // d1,d4 )
d1,e2 // d1,d4 by A49, AFF_1:def 1;
hence ( d4 in M & a1,a4 // d1,d4 ) by A3, A25, A44, A45, A46, A47, A48, AFF_1:5, AFF_1:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider d4 being Element of X such that
A50: d4 in M and
A51: a1,a4 // d1,d4 ;
A52: not d4 in N by A2, A8, A11, A50, AFF_1:45;
A53: b2,b1 // d2,d1 by A3, A12, A20, A33, AFF_1:5;
A54: b1,b4 // d1,d4 by A3, A11, A21, A51, AFF_1:5;
b3,b2 // d3,d2 by A4, A12, A19, A42, AFF_1:5;
then A55: b3,b4 // d3,d4 by A1, A2, A5, A6, A9, A10, A13, A14, A17, A18, A23, A32, A41, A50, A24, A43, A34, A52, A53, A54;
a3,a4 // d3,d4 by A1, A2, A3, A4, A7, A8, A11, A12, A15, A16, A23, A32, A33, A41, A42, A50, A51, A24, A43, A34, A52;
hence a3,a4 // b3,b4 by A50, A43, A55, AFF_1:5; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence X is satisfying_minor_Scherungssatz ; :: thesis: verum