A1: succ 0 = 0 + 1 ;
A2: succ 2 = 2 + 1 ;
let k be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: for X being non empty set st 2 <= k & k + 2 c= card X holds
for K being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) holds
( not K is maximal_clique or K is STAR or K is TOP )

let X be non empty set ; :: thesis: ( 2 <= k & k + 2 c= card X implies for K being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) holds
( not K is maximal_clique or K is STAR or K is TOP ) )

assume that
A3: 2 <= k and
A4: k + 2 c= card X ; :: thesis: for K being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) holds
( not K is maximal_clique or K is STAR or K is TOP )

k + 1 <= k + 2 by XREAL_1:7;
then A5: Segm (k + 1) c= Segm (k + 2) by NAT_1:39;
then A6: k + 1 c= card X by A4;
then A7: the Points of (G_ (k,X)) = { A where A is Subset of X : card A = k } by A3, Def1;
A8: succ (Segm (k + 1)) = Segm ((k + 1) + 1) by NAT_1:38;
A9: 1 <= k by A3, XXREAL_0:2;
let K be Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)); :: thesis: ( not K is maximal_clique or K is STAR or K is TOP )
A10: succ (Segm k) = Segm (k + 1) by NAT_1:38;
0 c= card K ;
then 0 in succ (card K) by ORDINAL1:22;
then A11: ( card K = 0 or 0 in card K ) by ORDINAL1:8;
assume A12: K is maximal_clique ; :: thesis: ( K is STAR or K is TOP )
then A13: K is clique ;
A14: the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) = { L where L is Subset of X : card L = k + 1 } by A3, A6, Def1;
k <= k + 1 by NAT_1:11;
then A15: Segm k c= Segm (k + 1) by NAT_1:39;
then A16: k c= card X by A6;
K <> {}
proof
consider A1 being set such that
A17: A1 c= X and
A18: card A1 = k by A16, CARD_FIL:36;
A1 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A7, A17, A18;
then consider A being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A19: A = A1 ;
card A <> card X
proof
assume card A = card X ; :: thesis: contradiction
then k + 1 c= k by A4, A5, A18, A19;
then k in k by A10, ORDINAL1:21;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then card A in card X by A16, A18, A19, CARD_1:3;
then X \ A <> {} by CARD_1:68;
then consider x being object such that
A20: x in X \ A by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
{x} c= X by A20, ZFMISC_1:31;
then A21: A \/ {x} c= X by A17, A19, XBOOLE_1:8;
A22: not x in A by A20, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A is finite by A18, A19;
then card (A \/ {x}) = k + 1 by A18, A19, A22, CARD_2:41;
then A \/ {x} in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) by A14, A21;
then consider L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A23: L = A \/ {x} ;
consider U being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A24: U = {A} ;
A c= L by A23, XBOOLE_1:7;
then A25: A on L by A3, A6, Th10;
A26: U is clique
proof
let B, C be POINT of (G_ (k,X)); :: according to COMBGRAS:def 2 :: thesis: ( B in U & C in U implies ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B,C} on L )
assume ( B in U & C in U ) ; :: thesis: ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B,C} on L
then ( B on L & C on L ) by A25, A24, TARSKI:def 1;
then {B,C} on L by INCSP_1:1;
hence ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B,C} on L ; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume A27: K = {} ; :: thesis: contradiction
then K c= U ;
hence contradiction by A12, A27, A24, A26; :: thesis: verum
end;
then 1 c= card K by A1, A11, ORDINAL1:21;
then 1 in succ (card K) by ORDINAL1:22;
then A28: ( card K = 1 or 1 in card K ) by ORDINAL1:8;
A29: k - 1 is Element of NAT by A3, NAT_1:21, XXREAL_0:2;
then reconsider k1 = k - 1 as Nat ;
A30: card K <> 1
proof
assume card K = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider A3 being object such that
A31: K = {A3} by CARD_2:42;
A32: A3 in K by A31, TARSKI:def 1;
then consider A being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A33: A = A3 ;
A3 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A32;
then A34: ex A4 being Subset of X st
( A = A4 & card A4 = k ) by A7, A33;
then reconsider AA = A as finite set ;
A35: A is finite by A34;
A36: card A <> card X
proof
assume card A = card X ; :: thesis: contradiction
then k + 1 c= k by A4, A5, A34;
then k in k by A10, ORDINAL1:21;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
card A c= card X by A6, A15, A34;
then card A in card X by A36, CARD_1:3;
then X \ A <> {} by CARD_1:68;
then consider x being object such that
A37: x in X \ A by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A38: {x} c= X by A37, ZFMISC_1:31;
then A39: A \/ {x} c= X by A34, XBOOLE_1:8;
not x in A by A37, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then card (A \/ {x}) = k + 1 by A34, A35, CARD_2:41;
then A \/ {x} in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) by A14, A39;
then consider L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A40: L = A \/ {x} ;
k - 1 <= (k - 1) + 1 by A29, NAT_1:11;
then Segm k1 c= Segm (card AA) by A34, NAT_1:39;
then consider B2 being set such that
A41: B2 c= A and
A42: card B2 = k - 1 by CARD_FIL:36;
A43: B2 is finite by A3, A42, NAT_1:21, XXREAL_0:2;
B2 c= X by A34, A41, XBOOLE_1:1;
then A44: B2 \/ {x} c= X by A38, XBOOLE_1:8;
not x in B2 by A37, A41, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then card (B2 \/ {x}) = (k - 1) + 1 by A42, A43, CARD_2:41;
then B2 \/ {x} in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A7, A44;
then consider A1 being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A45: A1 = B2 \/ {x} ;
A46: {x} c= L by A40, XBOOLE_1:7;
A47: A c= L by A40, XBOOLE_1:7;
then B2 c= L by A41;
then A1 c= L by A45, A46, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A48: A1 on L by A3, A6, Th10;
{x} c= A1 by A45, XBOOLE_1:7;
then x in A1 by ZFMISC_1:31;
then A49: A <> A1 by A37, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
consider U being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A50: U = {A,A1} ;
A51: A on L by A3, A6, A47, Th10;
A52: U is clique
proof
let B1, B2 be POINT of (G_ (k,X)); :: according to COMBGRAS:def 2 :: thesis: ( B1 in U & B2 in U implies ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B1,B2} on L )
assume ( B1 in U & B2 in U ) ; :: thesis: ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B1,B2} on L
then ( B1 on L & B2 on L ) by A51, A48, A50, TARSKI:def 2;
then {B1,B2} on L by INCSP_1:1;
hence ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {B1,B2} on L ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A in U by A50, TARSKI:def 2;
then A53: K c= U by A31, A33, ZFMISC_1:31;
A1 in U by A50, TARSKI:def 2;
then U <> K by A31, A33, A49, TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by A12, A53, A52; :: thesis: verum
end;
succ 1 = 1 + 1 ;
then A54: 2 c= card K by A30, A28, ORDINAL1:21;
then consider R being set such that
A55: R c= K and
A56: card R = 2 by CARD_FIL:36;
consider A1, B1 being object such that
A57: A1 <> B1 and
A58: R = {A1,B1} by A56, CARD_2:60;
A59: A1 in R by A58, TARSKI:def 2;
then A60: A1 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A55, TARSKI:def 3;
then consider A being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A61: A = A1 ;
A62: B1 in R by A58, TARSKI:def 2;
then A63: B1 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A55, TARSKI:def 3;
then consider B being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A64: B = B1 ;
consider L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A65: {A,B} on L by A13, A55, A59, A62, A61, A64;
L in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A66: ex L1 being Subset of X st
( L1 = L & card L1 = k + 1 ) by A14;
then A67: L is finite ;
A on L by A65, INCSP_1:1;
then A68: A c= L by A3, A6, Th10;
then A69: A /\ B c= L by XBOOLE_1:108;
then A70: A /\ B c= X by A66, XBOOLE_1:1;
B on L by A65, INCSP_1:1;
then A71: B c= L by A3, A6, Th10;
then A72: A \/ B c= L by A68, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A73: card (A \/ B) c= k + 1 by A66, CARD_1:11;
A74: ex B2 being Subset of X st
( B2 = B & card B2 = k ) by A7, A63, A64;
then A75: B is finite ;
A76: ex A2 being Subset of X st
( A2 = A & card A2 = k ) by A7, A60, A61;
then A77: A is finite ;
A78: k + 1 c= card (A \/ B) by A57, A61, A64, A76, A74, Th1;
then A79: card (A \/ B) = k + 1 by A73, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A80: A \/ B = L by A68, A71, A66, A67, CARD_2:102, XBOOLE_1:8;
A81: ( ( for C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) holds
( not C in K or not C on L or not A <> C or not B <> C ) ) implies K is STAR )
proof
A82: card L <> card X
proof
assume card L = card X ; :: thesis: contradiction
then k + 1 in k + 1 by A4, A8, A66, ORDINAL1:21;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
card L c= card X by A4, A5, A66;
then card L in card X by A82, CARD_1:3;
then X \ L <> {} by CARD_1:68;
then consider x being object such that
A83: x in X \ L by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A84: ( not x in A & not x in B ) by A68, A71, A83, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A85: ( A /\ {x} = {} & B /\ {x} = {} )
proof
assume ( A /\ {x} <> {} or B /\ {x} <> {} ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider z1 being object such that
A86: ( z1 in A /\ {x} or z1 in B /\ {x} ) by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
( ( z1 in A & z1 in {x} ) or ( z1 in B & z1 in {x} ) ) by A86, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by A84, TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
A87: ( card A = (k - 1) + 1 & card (A \/ B) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) ) by A76, A73, A78, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A88: card (A /\ B) = k - 1 by A29, A74, Th2;
then card (A \ (A /\ B)) = k - (k - 1) by A76, A77, CARD_2:44, XBOOLE_1:17;
then consider z1 being object such that
A89: A \ (A /\ B) = {z1} by CARD_2:42;
card (B \ (A /\ B)) = k - (k - 1) by A74, A75, A88, CARD_2:44, XBOOLE_1:17;
then consider z2 being object such that
A90: B \ (A /\ B) = {z2} by CARD_2:42;
A91: B = (A /\ B) \/ {z2} by A90, XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:45;
A92: z2 in {z2} by TARSKI:def 1;
A93: card (A \/ B) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A73, A78, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
A94: not x in A /\ B by A69, A83, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
card A = (k - 1) + 1 by A76;
then card (A /\ B) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A93, Th2;
then A95: card ((A /\ B) \/ {x}) = (k - 1) + 1 by A68, A67, A94, CARD_2:41;
{x} c= X by A83, ZFMISC_1:31;
then A96: (A /\ B) \/ {x} c= X by A70, XBOOLE_1:8;
then (A /\ B) \/ {x} in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A7, A95;
then consider C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A97: C = (A /\ B) \/ {x} ;
A98: B \/ C c= X by A74, A96, A97, XBOOLE_1:8;
A99: A \/ C c= X by A76, A96, A97, XBOOLE_1:8;
A100: 1 + 1 <= k + 1 by A9, XREAL_1:7;
A101: A /\ B c= B by XBOOLE_1:17;
B /\ C = (B /\ {x}) \/ (B /\ (B /\ A)) by A97, XBOOLE_1:23;
then B /\ C = (B /\ {x}) \/ ((B /\ B) /\ A) by XBOOLE_1:16;
then card (B /\ C) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A85, A87, Th2;
then card (B \/ C) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A29, A74, A95, A97, Th2;
then B \/ C in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) by A14, A98;
then consider L2 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A102: L2 = B \/ C ;
A /\ C = (A /\ {x}) \/ (A /\ (A /\ B)) by A97, XBOOLE_1:23;
then A /\ C = (A /\ {x}) \/ ((A /\ A) /\ B) by XBOOLE_1:16;
then card (A /\ C) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A85, A87, Th2;
then card (A \/ C) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A29, A76, A95, A97, Th2;
then A \/ C in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) by A14, A99;
then consider L1 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A103: L1 = A \/ C ;
A104: {A,B,C} is clique
proof
let Z1, Z2 be POINT of (G_ (k,X)); :: according to COMBGRAS:def 2 :: thesis: ( Z1 in {A,B,C} & Z2 in {A,B,C} implies ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {Z1,Z2} on L )
assume that
A105: Z1 in {A,B,C} and
A106: Z2 in {A,B,C} ; :: thesis: ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {Z1,Z2} on L
A107: ( Z2 = A or Z2 = B or Z2 = C ) by A106, ENUMSET1:def 1;
( Z1 = A or Z1 = B or Z1 = C ) by A105, ENUMSET1:def 1;
then ( ( Z1 c= A \/ B & Z2 c= A \/ B ) or ( Z1 c= A \/ C & Z2 c= A \/ C ) or ( Z1 c= B \/ C & Z2 c= B \/ C ) ) by A107, XBOOLE_1:11;
then ( ( Z1 on L & Z2 on L ) or ( Z1 on L1 & Z2 on L1 ) or ( Z1 on L2 & Z2 on L2 ) ) by A3, A6, A80, A103, A102, Th10;
then ( {Z1,Z2} on L or {Z1,Z2} on L1 or {Z1,Z2} on L2 ) by INCSP_1:1;
hence ex L being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) st {Z1,Z2} on L ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A108: ( C <> A & C <> B ) by A84, A97, XBOOLE_1:11, ZFMISC_1:31;
A109: 3 c= card K
proof end;
card {A,B} <> card K
proof
assume card {A,B} = card K ; :: thesis: contradiction
then 3 in 3 by A2, A56, A58, A61, A64, A109, ORDINAL1:22;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then card {A,B} in card K by A54, A56, A58, A61, A64, CARD_1:3;
then K \ {A,B} <> {} by CARD_1:68;
then consider E2 being object such that
A112: E2 in K \ {A,B} by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A113: card A = (k - 1) + 1 by A76;
then A114: card (A /\ B) = (k + 1) - 2 by A29, A74, A93, Th2;
A115: card B = (k - 1) + 1 by A74;
A116: A /\ B c= A by XBOOLE_1:17;
A117: not E2 in {A,B} by A112, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then A118: E2 <> A by TARSKI:def 2;
E2 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A112;
then consider E1 being Subset of X such that
A119: E1 = E2 and
A120: card E1 = k by A7;
consider E being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A121: E = E1 by A112, A119;
A122: A = (A /\ B) \/ {z1} by A89, XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:45;
A123: z1 in {z1} by TARSKI:def 1;
then A124: not z1 in A /\ B by A89, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A125: ( card A = (k + 1) - 1 & 2 + 1 <= k + 1 ) by A3, A76, XREAL_1:7;
consider S being set such that
A126: S = { D where D is Subset of X : ( card D = k & A /\ B c= D ) } ;
A127: E2 in K by A112, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then consider K1 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A128: {A,E} on K1 by A13, A55, A59, A61, A119, A121;
consider K2 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A129: {B,E} on K2 by A13, A55, A62, A64, A127, A119, A121;
E on K2 by A129, INCSP_1:1;
then A130: E c= K2 by A3, A6, Th10;
K2 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A131: ex M2 being Subset of X st
( K2 = M2 & card M2 = k + 1 ) by A14;
B on K2 by A129, INCSP_1:1;
then B c= K2 by A3, A6, Th10;
then B \/ E c= K2 by A130, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A132: card (B \/ E) c= k + 1 by A131, CARD_1:11;
A133: E2 <> B by A117, TARSKI:def 2;
then k + 1 c= card (B \/ E) by A74, A119, A120, A121, Th1;
then card (B \/ E) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A132, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A134: card (B /\ E) = (k + 1) - 2 by A29, A120, A121, A115, Th2;
assume for C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) holds
( not C in K or not C on L or not A <> C or not B <> C ) ; :: thesis: K is STAR
then A135: not E on L by A127, A118, A133, A119, A121;
A136: not card ((A \/ B) \/ E) = k + 1
proof
assume A137: card ((A \/ B) \/ E) = k + 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then ( A \/ B c= (A \/ B) \/ E & (A \/ B) \/ E is finite ) by XBOOLE_1:7;
then A138: A \/ B = (A \/ B) \/ E by A79, A137, CARD_2:102;
E c= (A \/ B) \/ E by XBOOLE_1:7;
then E c= L by A72, A138;
hence contradiction by A3, A6, A135, Th10; :: thesis: verum
end;
E on K1 by A128, INCSP_1:1;
then A139: E c= K1 by A3, A6, Th10;
K1 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A140: ex M1 being Subset of X st
( K1 = M1 & card M1 = k + 1 ) by A14;
A on K1 by A128, INCSP_1:1;
then A c= K1 by A3, A6, Th10;
then A \/ E c= K1 by A139, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A141: card (A \/ E) c= k + 1 by A140, CARD_1:11;
k + 1 c= card (A \/ E) by A76, A118, A119, A120, A121, Th1;
then card (A \/ E) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A141, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then card (A /\ E) = (k + 1) - 2 by A29, A120, A121, A113, Th2;
then ( ( card ((A /\ B) /\ E) = (k + 1) - 2 & card ((A \/ B) \/ E) = (k + 1) + 1 ) or ( card ((A /\ B) /\ E) = (k + 1) - 3 & card ((A \/ B) \/ E) = k + 1 ) ) by A74, A120, A121, A134, A125, A100, A114, Th7;
then A142: A /\ B = (A /\ B) /\ E by A68, A67, A88, A136, CARD_2:102, XBOOLE_1:17;
then A143: A /\ B c= E by XBOOLE_1:17;
E is finite by A120, A121;
then card (E \ (A /\ B)) = k - (k - 1) by A88, A120, A121, A142, CARD_2:44, XBOOLE_1:17;
then consider z4 being object such that
A144: E \ (A /\ B) = {z4} by CARD_2:42;
A145: E = (A /\ B) \/ {z4} by A142, A144, XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:45;
A146: K c= S
proof
assume not K c= S ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider D2 being object such that
A147: D2 in K and
A148: not D2 in S ;
D2 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A147;
then consider D1 being Subset of X such that
A149: D1 = D2 and
A150: card D1 = k by A7;
consider D being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A151: D = D1 by A147, A149;
consider K11 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A152: {A,D} on K11 by A13, A55, A59, A61, A147, A149, A151;
D on K11 by A152, INCSP_1:1;
then A153: D c= K11 by A3, A6, Th10;
K11 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A154: ex R11 being Subset of X st
( R11 = K11 & card R11 = k + 1 ) by A14;
A155: card D = (k - 1) + 1 by A150, A151;
consider K13 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A156: {E,D} on K13 by A13, A127, A119, A121, A147, A149, A151;
consider K12 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A157: {B,D} on K12 by A13, A55, A62, A64, A147, A149, A151;
A on K11 by A152, INCSP_1:1;
then A c= K11 by A3, A6, Th10;
then A \/ D c= K11 by A153, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A158: card (A \/ D) c= k + 1 by A154, CARD_1:11;
A <> D by A126, A116, A148, A149, A150, A151;
then k + 1 c= card (A \/ D) by A76, A150, A151, Th1;
then card (A \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A158, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A159: card (A /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A76, A155, Th2;
not A /\ B c= D by A126, A148, A149, A150, A151;
then ex y being object st
( y in A /\ B & not y in D ) ;
then A /\ B <> (A /\ B) /\ D by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A160: card ((A /\ B) /\ D) <> card (A /\ B) by A77, CARD_2:102, XBOOLE_1:17;
D on K13 by A156, INCSP_1:1;
then A161: D c= K13 by A3, A6, Th10;
K13 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A162: ex R13 being Subset of X st
( R13 = K13 & card R13 = k + 1 ) by A14;
D on K12 by A157, INCSP_1:1;
then A163: D c= K12 by A3, A6, Th10;
K12 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A164: ex R12 being Subset of X st
( R12 = K12 & card R12 = k + 1 ) by A14;
B on K12 by A157, INCSP_1:1;
then B c= K12 by A3, A6, Th10;
then B \/ D c= K12 by A163, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A165: card (B \/ D) c= k + 1 by A164, CARD_1:11;
B <> D by A126, A101, A148, A149, A150, A151;
then k + 1 c= card (B \/ D) by A74, A150, A151, Th1;
then card (B \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A165, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A166: card (B /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A155, Th2;
E on K13 by A156, INCSP_1:1;
then E c= K13 by A3, A6, Th10;
then E \/ D c= K13 by A161, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A167: card (E \/ D) c= k + 1 by A162, CARD_1:11;
E <> D by A126, A143, A148, A149, A150, A151;
then k + 1 c= card (E \/ D) by A120, A121, A150, A151, Th1;
then card (E \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A167, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A168: card (E /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A120, A121, A155, Th2;
A169: ( z1 in D & z2 in D & z4 in D )
proof
assume ( not z1 in D or not z2 in D or not z4 in D ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then ( ( A /\ D = ((A /\ B) \/ {z1}) /\ D & {z1} misses D ) or ( B /\ D = ((A /\ B) \/ {z2}) /\ D & {z2} misses D ) or ( E /\ D = ((A /\ B) \/ {z4}) /\ D & {z4} misses D ) ) by A89, A90, A142, A144, XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:45, ZFMISC_1:50;
then ( ( A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ ({z1} /\ D) & {z1} /\ D = {} ) or ( B /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ ({z2} /\ D) & {z2} /\ D = {} ) or ( E /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ ({z4} /\ D) & {z4} /\ D = {} ) ) by XBOOLE_0:def 7, XBOOLE_1:23;
hence contradiction by A29, A74, A87, A159, A166, A168, A160, Th2; :: thesis: verum
end;
then ( {z1,z2} c= D & {z4} c= D ) by ZFMISC_1:31, ZFMISC_1:32;
then {z1,z2} \/ {z4} c= D by XBOOLE_1:8;
then ( (A /\ B) /\ D c= D & {z1,z2,z4} c= D ) by ENUMSET1:3, XBOOLE_1:17;
then A170: ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ {z1,z2,z4} c= D by XBOOLE_1:8;
A171: ( z4 in E \ (A /\ B) & (A /\ B) /\ D c= A /\ B ) by A144, TARSKI:def 1, XBOOLE_1:17;
A172: {z1,z2,z4} misses (A /\ B) /\ D
proof
assume not {z1,z2,z4} misses (A /\ B) /\ D ; :: thesis: contradiction
then {z1,z2,z4} /\ ((A /\ B) /\ D) <> {} by XBOOLE_0:def 7;
then consider m being object such that
A173: m in {z1,z2,z4} /\ ((A /\ B) /\ D) by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
m in {z1,z2,z4} by A173, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A174: ( m = z1 or m = z2 or m = z4 ) by ENUMSET1:def 1;
m in (A /\ B) /\ D by A173, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by A89, A90, A123, A92, A171, A174, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
reconsider r = card ((A /\ B) /\ D) as Nat by A77;
A175: not z1 in (A /\ B) /\ D by A124, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A /\ D = ((A /\ B) \/ {z1}) /\ D by A89, XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:45;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ ({z1} /\ D) by XBOOLE_1:23;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ {z1} by A169, ZFMISC_1:46;
then A176: card (A /\ D) = r + 1 by A77, A175, CARD_2:41;
card {z1,z2,z4} = 3 by A57, A61, A64, A122, A91, A118, A133, A119, A121, A145, CARD_2:58;
then card (((A /\ B) /\ D) \/ {z1,z2,z4}) = (k - 2) + 3 by A77, A159, A176, A172, CARD_2:40;
then k + 1 c= k by A150, A151, A170, CARD_1:11;
then k in k by A10, ORDINAL1:21;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
S c= the Points of (G_ (k,X))
proof
let Z be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not Z in S or Z in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) )
assume Z in S ; :: thesis: Z in the Points of (G_ (k,X))
then ex Z1 being Subset of X st
( Z = Z1 & card Z1 = k & A /\ B c= Z1 ) by A126;
hence Z in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider S1 being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A177: S1 = S ;
A178: S1 is STAR by A70, A126, A88, A177;
then S1 is maximal_clique by A3, A4, Th14;
then S1 is clique ;
hence K is STAR by A12, A146, A177, A178; :: thesis: verum
end;
reconsider k2 = k - 2 as Element of NAT by A3, NAT_1:21;
A179: succ (Segm k2) = Segm (k2 + 1) by NAT_1:38;
( ex C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) st
( C in K & C on L & A <> C & B <> C ) implies K is TOP )
proof
A180: 1 + 1 <= k + 1 by A9, XREAL_1:7;
A181: card B = (k - 1) + 1 by A74;
A182: card A = (k - 1) + 1 by A76;
assume ex C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) st
( C in K & C on L & A <> C & B <> C ) ; :: thesis: K is TOP
then consider C being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A183: C in K and
A184: C on L and
A185: A <> C and
A186: B <> C ;
A187: C c= L by A3, A6, A184, Th10;
then A \/ C c= L by A68, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A188: card (A \/ C) c= k + 1 by A66, CARD_1:11;
B \/ C c= L by A71, A187, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A189: card (B \/ C) c= k + 1 by A66, CARD_1:11;
C in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A190: ex C2 being Subset of X st
( C2 = C & card C2 = k ) by A7;
then k + 1 c= card (B \/ C) by A74, A186, Th1;
then card (B \/ C) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A189, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A191: card (B /\ C) = (k + 1) - 2 by A29, A190, A181, Th2;
k + 1 c= card (A \/ C) by A76, A185, A190, Th1;
then card (A \/ C) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A188, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A192: card (A /\ C) = (k + 1) - 2 by A29, A190, A182, Th2;
A193: card (A \/ B) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A73, A78, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then A194: A \/ B = L by A68, A71, A66, A67, CARD_2:102, XBOOLE_1:8;
A195: A \/ B c= (A \/ B) \/ C by XBOOLE_1:7;
(A \/ B) \/ C c= L by A72, A187, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A196: card ((A \/ B) \/ C) = k + 1 by A193, A194, A195, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
A197: ( card A = (k + 1) - 1 & 2 + 1 <= k + 1 ) by A3, A76, XREAL_1:7;
consider T being set such that
A198: T = { D where D is Subset of X : ( card D = k & D c= L ) } ;
card (A /\ B) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A193, A182, Th2;
then A199: ( ( card ((A /\ B) /\ C) = (k + 1) - 3 & card ((A \/ B) \/ C) = k + 1 ) or ( card ((A /\ B) /\ C) = (k + 1) - 2 & card ((A \/ B) \/ C) = (k + 1) + 1 ) ) by A74, A190, A192, A197, A191, A180, Th7;
A200: K c= T
proof
let D2 be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not D2 in K or D2 in T )
assume that
A201: D2 in K and
A202: not D2 in T ; :: thesis: contradiction
D2 in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A201;
then consider D1 being Subset of X such that
A203: D1 = D2 and
A204: card D1 = k by A7;
consider D being POINT of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A205: D = D1 by A201, A203;
not D c= L by A198, A202, A203, A204, A205;
then consider x being object such that
A206: x in D and
A207: not x in L ;
A208: card {x} = 1 by CARD_1:30;
A209: D is finite by A204, A205;
A210: card D = (k - 1) + 1 by A204, A205;
{x} c= D by A206, ZFMISC_1:31;
then A211: card (D \ {x}) = k - 1 by A204, A205, A209, A208, CARD_2:44;
consider L13 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A212: {C,D} on L13 by A13, A183, A201, A203, A205;
D on L13 by A212, INCSP_1:1;
then A213: D c= L13 by A3, A6, Th10;
L13 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A214: ex L23 being Subset of X st
( L23 = L13 & card L23 = k + 1 ) by A14;
C on L13 by A212, INCSP_1:1;
then C c= L13 by A3, A6, Th10;
then C \/ D c= L13 by A213, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A215: card (C \/ D) c= k + 1 by A214, CARD_1:11;
A216: not x in C by A187, A207;
A217: C /\ D c= D \ {x}
proof
let z be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not z in C /\ D or z in D \ {x} )
assume A218: z in C /\ D ; :: thesis: z in D \ {x}
then z <> x by A216, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A219: not z in {x} by TARSKI:def 1;
z in D by A218, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence z in D \ {x} by A219, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
C <> D by A187, A198, A202, A203, A204, A205;
then k + 1 c= card (C \/ D) by A190, A204, A205, Th1;
then card (C \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A215, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then card (C /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A190, A210, Th2;
then A220: C /\ D = D \ {x} by A209, A211, A217, CARD_2:102;
consider L12 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A221: {B,D} on L12 by A13, A55, A62, A64, A201, A203, A205;
consider L11 being LINE of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A222: {A,D} on L11 by A13, A55, A59, A61, A201, A203, A205;
D on L11 by A222, INCSP_1:1;
then A223: D c= L11 by A3, A6, Th10;
L11 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A224: ex L21 being Subset of X st
( L21 = L11 & card L21 = k + 1 ) by A14;
A on L11 by A222, INCSP_1:1;
then A c= L11 by A3, A6, Th10;
then A \/ D c= L11 by A223, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A225: card (A \/ D) c= k + 1 by A224, CARD_1:11;
A226: not x in A by A68, A207;
A227: A /\ D c= D \ {x}
proof
let z be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not z in A /\ D or z in D \ {x} )
assume A228: z in A /\ D ; :: thesis: z in D \ {x}
then z <> x by A226, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A229: not z in {x} by TARSKI:def 1;
z in D by A228, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence z in D \ {x} by A229, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
A <> D by A68, A198, A202, A203, A204, A205;
then k + 1 c= card (A \/ D) by A76, A204, A205, Th1;
then A230: card (A \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A225, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then card (A /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A76, A210, Th2;
then A231: A /\ D = D \ {x} by A209, A211, A227, CARD_2:102;
D on L12 by A221, INCSP_1:1;
then A232: D c= L12 by A3, A6, Th10;
L12 in the Lines of (G_ (k,X)) ;
then A233: ex L22 being Subset of X st
( L22 = L12 & card L22 = k + 1 ) by A14;
B on L12 by A221, INCSP_1:1;
then B c= L12 by A3, A6, Th10;
then B \/ D c= L12 by A232, XBOOLE_1:8;
then A234: card (B \/ D) c= k + 1 by A233, CARD_1:11;
A235: not x in B by A71, A207;
A236: B /\ D c= D \ {x}
proof
let z be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not z in B /\ D or z in D \ {x} )
assume A237: z in B /\ D ; :: thesis: z in D \ {x}
then z <> x by A235, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A238: not z in {x} by TARSKI:def 1;
z in D by A237, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence z in D \ {x} by A238, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
B <> D by A71, A198, A202, A203, A204, A205;
then k + 1 c= card (B \/ D) by A74, A204, A205, Th1;
then card (B \/ D) = (k - 1) + (2 * 1) by A234, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then card (B /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A74, A210, Th2;
then B /\ D = D \ {x} by A209, A211, A236, CARD_2:102;
then A /\ D = (A /\ D) /\ (B /\ D) by A231;
then A /\ D = (A /\ (D /\ B)) /\ D by XBOOLE_1:16;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) /\ D by XBOOLE_1:16;
then A /\ D = (A /\ B) /\ (D /\ D) by XBOOLE_1:16;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ D) /\ (C /\ D) by A231, A220;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ (D /\ C)) /\ D by XBOOLE_1:16;
then A /\ D = (((A /\ B) /\ C) /\ D) /\ D by XBOOLE_1:16;
then A /\ D = ((A /\ B) /\ C) /\ (D /\ D) by XBOOLE_1:16;
then card (((A /\ B) /\ C) /\ D) = k - 1 by A29, A76, A210, A230, Th2;
then k - 1 c= k2 by A196, A199, CARD_1:11, XBOOLE_1:17;
then k - 1 in k - 1 by A179, ORDINAL1:22;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
T c= the Points of (G_ (k,X))
proof
let e be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not e in T or e in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) )
assume e in T ; :: thesis: e in the Points of (G_ (k,X))
then ex E being Subset of X st
( e = E & card E = k & E c= L ) by A198;
hence e in the Points of (G_ (k,X)) by A7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then consider T1 being Subset of the Points of (G_ (k,X)) such that
A239: T1 = T ;
A240: T1 is TOP by A66, A198, A239;
then T1 is maximal_clique by A3, A4, Th14;
then T1 is clique ;
hence K is TOP by A12, A200, A239, A240; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ( K is STAR or K is TOP ) by A81; :: thesis: verum