let X be set ; for A, B being Ordinal st A c= B holds
Tarski-Class (X,A) c= Tarski-Class (X,B)
let A, B be Ordinal; ( A c= B implies Tarski-Class (X,A) c= Tarski-Class (X,B) )
defpred S1[ Ordinal] means ( A c= $1 implies Tarski-Class (X,A) c= Tarski-Class (X,$1) );
A1:
for B being Ordinal st ( for C being Ordinal st C in B holds
S1[C] ) holds
S1[B]
proof
let B be
Ordinal;
( ( for C being Ordinal st C in B holds
S1[C] ) implies S1[B] )
assume that A2:
for
C being
Ordinal st
C in B holds
S1[
C]
and A3:
A c= B
;
Tarski-Class (X,A) c= Tarski-Class (X,B)
let x be
object ;
TARSKI:def 3 ( not x in Tarski-Class (X,A) or x in Tarski-Class (X,B) )
assume A4:
x in Tarski-Class (
X,
A)
;
x in Tarski-Class (X,B)
now ( A <> B implies x in Tarski-Class (X,B) )assume A5:
A <> B
;
x in Tarski-Class (X,B)then A6:
A in B
by ORDINAL1:11, A3, XBOOLE_0:def 8;
A7:
B <> {}
by A3, A5;
A8:
now ( ex C being Ordinal st B = succ C implies x in Tarski-Class (X,B) )given C being
Ordinal such that A9:
B = succ C
;
x in Tarski-Class (X,B)
(
A c= C &
C in B )
by A6, A9, ORDINAL1:22;
then A10:
Tarski-Class (
X,
A)
c= Tarski-Class (
X,
C)
by A2;
Tarski-Class (
X,
C)
c= Tarski-Class (
X,
B)
by A9, Th15;
then
Tarski-Class (
X,
A)
c= Tarski-Class (
X,
B)
by A10;
hence
x in Tarski-Class (
X,
B)
by A4;
verum end; hence
x in Tarski-Class (
X,
B)
by A8;
verum end;
hence
x in Tarski-Class (
X,
B)
by A4;
verum
end;
for B being Ordinal holds S1[B]
from ORDINAL1:sch 2(A1);
hence
( A c= B implies Tarski-Class (X,A) c= Tarski-Class (X,B) )
; verum