let M be non countable Aleph; ( omega in cf M implies for S being non empty Subset-Family of M st card S in cf M & ( for X being Element of S holds
( X is closed & X is unbounded ) ) holds
( meet S is closed & meet S is unbounded ) )
assume A1:
omega in cf M
; for S being non empty Subset-Family of M st card S in cf M & ( for X being Element of S holds
( X is closed & X is unbounded ) ) holds
( meet S is closed & meet S is unbounded )
let S be non empty Subset-Family of M; ( card S in cf M & ( for X being Element of S holds
( X is closed & X is unbounded ) ) implies ( meet S is closed & meet S is unbounded ) )
assume that
A2:
card S in cf M
and
A3:
for X being Element of S holds
( X is closed & X is unbounded )
; ( meet S is closed & meet S is unbounded )
thus
meet S is closed
by A3, Th21; meet S is unbounded
for B1 being Ordinal st B1 in M holds
ex C being Ordinal st
( C in meet S & B1 c= C )
proof
let B1 be
Ordinal;
( B1 in M implies ex C being Ordinal st
( C in meet S & B1 c= C ) )
assume
B1 in M
;
ex C being Ordinal st
( C in meet S & B1 c= C )
then reconsider B11 =
B1 as
Element of
M ;
deffunc H1(
Element of
M)
-> Element of
bool M =
{ (LBound ($1,X)) where X is Element of S : X in S } /\ ([#] M);
defpred S1[
set ,
Element of
M,
set ]
means ( $3
= sup H1($2) & $2
in $3 );
A4:
for
B being
Element of
M holds
H1(
B)
= { (LBound (B,X)) where X is Element of S : X in S }
A6:
for
B being
Element of
M holds
(
sup H1(
B)
in M &
B in sup H1(
B) )
A10:
for
n being
Nat for
x being
Element of
M ex
y being
Element of
M st
S1[
n,
x,
y]
consider L being
sequence of
M such that A11:
L . 0 = B11
and A12:
for
n being
Nat holds
S1[
n,
L . n,
L . (n + 1)]
from RECDEF_1:sch 2(A10);
reconsider L1 =
L as
sequence of
([#] M) ;
take
sup (rng L)
;
( sup (rng L) in meet S & B1 c= sup (rng L) )
A13:
B1 in rng L
by A11, FUNCT_2:4;
reconsider RNG =
rng L as
Subset of
M by RELAT_1:def 19;
A14:
for
C1 being
Ordinal st
C1 in RNG holds
ex
C2 being
Ordinal st
(
C2 in RNG &
C1 in C2 )
sup (rng L1) in M
by A1, Th22;
then reconsider SUPL =
sup RNG as
limit_ordinal infinite Element of
M by A13, A14, Th3;
for
X1 being
set st
X1 in S holds
SUPL in X1
proof
let X1 be
set ;
( X1 in S implies SUPL in X1 )
assume
X1 in S
;
SUPL in X1
then reconsider X =
X1 as
Element of
S ;
A17:
(
X is
closed &
X is
unbounded )
by A3;
then A18:
not
X is
empty
by Th7;
sup (X /\ SUPL) = SUPL
proof
sup (X /\ SUPL) c= sup SUPL
by ORDINAL2:22, XBOOLE_1:17;
then A19:
sup (X /\ SUPL) c= SUPL
by ORDINAL2:18;
assume
sup (X /\ SUPL) <> SUPL
;
contradiction
then
sup (X /\ SUPL) c< SUPL
by A19, XBOOLE_0:def 8;
then consider B3 being
Ordinal such that A20:
B3 in rng L
and A21:
sup (X /\ SUPL) c= B3
by ORDINAL1:11, ORDINAL2:21;
consider y1 being
object such that A22:
y1 in dom L
and A23:
B3 = L . y1
by A20, FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y =
y1 as
Element of
NAT by A22, FUNCT_2:def 1;
LBound (
(L . y),
X)
in X
by A18;
then reconsider LBY =
LBound (
(L . y),
X) as
Element of
M ;
LBound (
(L . y),
X)
in { (LBound ((L . y),Y)) where Y is Element of S : Y in S }
;
then
LBound (
(L . y),
X)
in H1(
L . y)
by A4;
then
LBY in sup H1(
L . y)
by ORDINAL2:19;
then A24:
LBound (
(L . y),
X)
in L . (y + 1)
by A12;
L . (y + 1) in rng L
by FUNCT_2:4;
then
L . (y + 1) in SUPL
by ORDINAL2:19;
then
LBY in SUPL
by A24, ORDINAL1:10;
then
LBound (
(L . y),
X)
in X /\ SUPL
by A18, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
LBY in sup (X /\ SUPL)
by ORDINAL2:19;
then
LBY in L . y
by A21, A23;
hence
contradiction
by A17, Th9;
verum
end;
hence
SUPL in X1
by A17;
verum
end;
hence
sup (rng L) in meet S
by SETFAM_1:def 1;
B1 c= sup (rng L)
B1 in sup (rng L)
by A13, ORDINAL2:19;
hence
B1 c= sup (rng L)
by ORDINAL1:def 2;
verum
end;
hence
meet S is unbounded
by Th6; verum