let X, Y be set ; :: thesis: for x, y being object st X,Y are_equipotent & x in X & y in Y holds
X \ {x},Y \ {y} are_equipotent

let x, y be object ; :: thesis: ( X,Y are_equipotent & x in X & y in Y implies X \ {x},Y \ {y} are_equipotent )
given f being Function such that A1: f is one-to-one and
A2: dom f = X and
A3: rng f = Y ; :: according to WELLORD2:def 4 :: thesis: ( not x in X or not y in Y or X \ {x},Y \ {y} are_equipotent )
A4: X \ {x},f .: (X \ {x}) are_equipotent by A1, A2, Th32;
assume that
A5: x in X and
A6: y in Y ; :: thesis: X \ {x},Y \ {y} are_equipotent
f . x in Y by A2, A3, A5, FUNCT_1:def 3;
then A7: Y \ {(f . x)},Y \ {y} are_equipotent by A6, Th31;
f .: (X \ {x}) = (f .: X) \ (Im (f,x)) by A1, FUNCT_1:64
.= Y \ (Im (f,x)) by A2, A3, RELAT_1:113
.= Y \ {(f . x)} by A2, A5, FUNCT_1:59 ;
hence X \ {x},Y \ {y} are_equipotent by A4, A7, WELLORD2:15; :: thesis: verum