let AP be AffinPlane; :: thesis: ( AP is satisfying_DES1_1 implies AP is satisfying_DES1 )
assume A1: AP is satisfying_DES1_1 ; :: thesis: AP is satisfying_DES1
let A be Subset of AP; :: according to AFF_3:def 1 :: thesis: for P, C being Subset of AP
for o, a, a9, b, b9, c, c9, p, q being Element of AP st A is being_line & P is being_line & C is being_line & P <> A & P <> C & A <> C & o in A & a in A & a9 in A & o in P & b in P & b9 in P & o in C & c in C & c9 in C & o <> a & o <> b & o <> c & p <> q & not LIN b,a,c & not LIN b9,a9,c9 & a <> a9 & LIN b,a,p & LIN b9,a9,p & LIN b,c,q & LIN b9,c9,q & a,c // a9,c9 holds
a,c // p,q

let P, C be Subset of AP; :: thesis: for o, a, a9, b, b9, c, c9, p, q being Element of AP st A is being_line & P is being_line & C is being_line & P <> A & P <> C & A <> C & o in A & a in A & a9 in A & o in P & b in P & b9 in P & o in C & c in C & c9 in C & o <> a & o <> b & o <> c & p <> q & not LIN b,a,c & not LIN b9,a9,c9 & a <> a9 & LIN b,a,p & LIN b9,a9,p & LIN b,c,q & LIN b9,c9,q & a,c // a9,c9 holds
a,c // p,q

let o, a, a9, b, b9, c, c9, p, q be Element of AP; :: thesis: ( A is being_line & P is being_line & C is being_line & P <> A & P <> C & A <> C & o in A & a in A & a9 in A & o in P & b in P & b9 in P & o in C & c in C & c9 in C & o <> a & o <> b & o <> c & p <> q & not LIN b,a,c & not LIN b9,a9,c9 & a <> a9 & LIN b,a,p & LIN b9,a9,p & LIN b,c,q & LIN b9,c9,q & a,c // a9,c9 implies a,c // p,q )
assume that
A2: A is being_line and
A3: P is being_line and
A4: C is being_line and
A5: P <> A and
A6: P <> C and
A7: A <> C and
A8: o in A and
A9: a in A and
A10: a9 in A and
A11: o in P and
A12: b in P and
A13: b9 in P and
A14: o in C and
A15: c in C and
A16: c9 in C and
A17: o <> a and
A18: o <> b and
A19: o <> c and
A20: p <> q and
A21: not LIN b,a,c and
A22: not LIN b9,a9,c9 and
A23: a <> a9 and
A24: LIN b,a,p and
A25: LIN b9,a9,p and
A26: LIN b,c,q and
A27: LIN b9,c9,q and
A28: a,c // a9,c9 ; :: thesis: a,c // p,q
A29: a9 <> b9 by A22, AFF_1:7;
set M = Line (b,c);
A30: c in Line (b,c) by AFF_1:15;
then A31: Line (b,c) <> P by A3, A4, A6, A11, A14, A15, A19, AFF_1:18;
A32: Line (b,c) <> P by A3, A4, A6, A11, A14, A15, A19, A30, AFF_1:18;
A33: b in Line (b,c) by AFF_1:15;
set K = Line (b,a);
A34: a in Line (b,a) by AFF_1:15;
then A35: Line (b,a) <> P by A2, A3, A5, A8, A9, A11, A17, AFF_1:18;
A36: p in Line (b,a) by A24, AFF_1:def 2;
A37: ( a9 <> c9 & b <> a ) by A21, A22, AFF_1:7;
A38: b <> c by A21, AFF_1:7;
A39: q in Line (b,c) by A26, AFF_1:def 2;
A40: b9 <> c9 by A22, AFF_1:7;
A41: b in Line (b,a) by AFF_1:15;
A42: not LIN o,a,c
proof
assume LIN o,a,c ; :: thesis: contradiction
then c in A by A2, A8, A9, A17, AFF_1:25;
hence contradiction by A2, A4, A7, A8, A14, A15, A19, AFF_1:18; :: thesis: verum
end;
A43: c <> c9
proof
assume c = c9 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A44: c,a // c,a9 by A28, AFF_1:4;
( LIN o,a,a9 & not LIN o,c,a ) by A2, A8, A9, A10, A42, AFF_1:6, AFF_1:21;
hence contradiction by A23, A44, AFF_1:14; :: thesis: verum
end;
b <> c by A21, AFF_1:7;
then A45: Line (b,c) is being_line by AFF_1:def 3;
b <> a by A21, AFF_1:7;
then A46: Line (b,a) is being_line by AFF_1:def 3;
A47: Line (b,a) <> P by A2, A3, A5, A8, A9, A11, A17, A34, AFF_1:18;
A48: now :: thesis: ( LIN b9,p,q implies a,c // p,q )
set C9 = Line (b9,c9);
set A9 = Line (b9,a9);
A49: c9 in Line (b9,c9) by AFF_1:15;
A50: ( Line (b9,a9) is being_line & b9 in Line (b9,a9) ) by A29, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:def 3;
A51: a9 in Line (b9,a9) by AFF_1:15;
then A52: Line (b9,a9) <> Line (b9,c9) by A22, A50, A49, AFF_1:21;
A53: q in Line (b9,c9) by A27, AFF_1:def 2;
A54: p in Line (b9,a9) by A25, AFF_1:def 2;
A55: ( Line (b9,c9) is being_line & b9 in Line (b9,c9) ) by A40, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:def 3;
assume A56: LIN b9,p,q ; :: thesis: a,c // p,q
then A57: LIN b9,q,p by AFF_1:6;
A58: now :: thesis: ( b9 <> q implies a,c // p,q )
A59: Line (b9,c9) <> Line (b,c)
proof
assume Line (b9,c9) = Line (b,c) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then LIN c,c9,b by A45, A33, A30, A49, AFF_1:21;
then b in C by A4, A15, A16, A43, AFF_1:25;
hence contradiction by A3, A4, A6, A11, A12, A14, A18, AFF_1:18; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume b9 <> q ; :: thesis: a,c // p,q
then A60: p in Line (b9,c9) by A57, A55, A53, AFF_1:25;
then LIN b,a,b9 by A24, A50, A54, A55, A52, AFF_1:18;
then b9 in Line (b,a) by AFF_1:def 2;
then A61: b = b9 by A3, A12, A13, A46, A41, A47, AFF_1:18;
p = b9 by A50, A54, A55, A52, A60, AFF_1:18;
then p = q by A45, A33, A39, A55, A53, A61, A59, AFF_1:18;
hence a,c // p,q by AFF_1:3; :: thesis: verum
end;
now :: thesis: ( b9 <> p implies a,c // p,q )
A62: Line (b9,a9) <> Line (b,a)
proof
assume Line (b9,a9) = Line (b,a) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then LIN a,a9,b by A46, A41, A34, A51, AFF_1:21;
then b in A by A2, A9, A10, A23, AFF_1:25;
hence contradiction by A2, A3, A5, A8, A11, A12, A18, AFF_1:18; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume b9 <> p ; :: thesis: a,c // p,q
then A63: q in Line (b9,a9) by A56, A50, A54, AFF_1:25;
then LIN b,c,b9 by A26, A50, A55, A53, A52, AFF_1:18;
then b9 in Line (b,c) by AFF_1:def 2;
then A64: b = b9 by A3, A12, A13, A45, A33, A32, AFF_1:18;
q = b9 by A50, A55, A53, A52, A63, AFF_1:18;
then p = q by A46, A41, A36, A50, A54, A64, A62, AFF_1:18;
hence a,c // p,q by AFF_1:3; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence a,c // p,q by A20, A58; :: thesis: verum
end;
A65: Line (b,a) <> Line (b,c) by A21, A46, A41, A34, A30, AFF_1:21;
now :: thesis: ( not LIN b9,p,q implies a,c // p,q )
A66: ( LIN o,c,c9 & LIN b9,q,c9 ) by A4, A14, A15, A16, A27, AFF_1:6, AFF_1:21;
assume A67: not LIN b9,p,q ; :: thesis: a,c // p,q
( LIN o,a,a9 & LIN b9,p,a9 ) by A2, A8, A9, A10, A25, AFF_1:6, AFF_1:21;
hence a,c // p,q by A1, A3, A11, A12, A13, A18, A28, A46, A45, A41, A34, A33, A30, A36, A39, A31, A35, A37, A38, A65, A42, A43, A67, A66; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence a,c // p,q by A48; :: thesis: verum