let k, m, n be Nat; :: thesis: Ackermann (k,(Ackermann (m,n))) < Ackermann (((k + m) + 2),n)
A1: H1(k,H1(m,n)) <= H1(k + m,H1(m,n)) by Th24, NAT_1:11;
m < m + (k + 1) by NAT_1:16;
then H1(m,n) < H1((k + m) + 1,n) by Th23;
then H1(k + m,H1(m,n)) < H1(k + m,H1((k + m) + 1,n)) by Th18;
then A2: H1(k,H1(m,n)) < H1(k + m,H1((k + m) + 1,n)) by A1, XXREAL_0:2;
A3: H1(k + m,H1((k + m) + 1,n)) = H1((k + m) + 1,n + 1) by Th7;
H1((k + m) + 1,n + 1) <= H1(((k + m) + 1) + 1,n) by Th21;
hence H1(k,H1(m,n)) < H1((k + m) + 2,n) by A2, A3, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum