let seq1, seq2 be Real_Sequence; :: thesis: ( seq1 is V96() & seq2 is V96() implies lower_bound (seq1 + seq2) >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2) )
assume that
A1: seq1 is V96() and
A2: seq2 is V96() ; :: thesis: lower_bound (seq1 + seq2) >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2)
for n being Nat holds (seq1 + seq2) . n >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2)

proof

let n be Nat; :: thesis: (seq1 + seq2) . n >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2)
A3: seq2 . n >= lower_bound seq2 by A2, Th8;
( (seq1 + seq2) . n = (seq1 . n) + (seq2 . n) & seq1 . n >= lower_bound seq1 ) by A1, Th8, SEQ_1:7;
hence (seq1 + seq2) . n >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2) by A3, XREAL_1:7; :: thesis: verum

end;

hence lower_bound (seq1 + seq2) >= (lower_bound seq1) + (lower_bound seq2) by Th10; :: thesis: verum