let G be SimpleGraph; :: thesis: for C being finite Clique of (Mycielskian G) st 3 <= order C holds
for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G

let C be finite Clique of (Mycielskian G); :: thesis: ( 3 <= order C implies for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G )
assume A: 3 <= order C ; :: thesis: for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G
set MG = Mycielskian G;
let v be Vertex of C; :: thesis: v <> union G
assume B: v = union G ; :: thesis: contradiction
3 c= order C by A, NAT_1:39;
then consider v1, v2 being set such that
D: v1 in Vertices C and
E: v2 in Vertices C and
F: v1 <> v and
G: v2 <> v and
H: v1 <> v2 by card3;
Ia: {v,v1} in C by D, Clique2a;
Ja: {v,v2} in C by E, Clique2a;
I1: {v,v1} in Edges (Mycielskian G) by Ia, F, SG4a;
J1: {v,v2} in Edges (Mycielskian G) by G, Ja, SG4a;
consider x1 being set such that
x1 in union G and
Kb: v1 = [x1,(union G)] by B, I1, M0e2;
consider x2 being set such that
x2 in union G and
Lb: v2 = [x2,(union G)] by B, J1, M0e2;
{v1,v2} in C by D, E, Clique2a;
hence contradiction by Kb, Lb, H, M0e3a; :: thesis: verum