let X be finite set ; card { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } = 2 * (card (PairsOf X))
set Y = union X;
set B = { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } ;
set A = { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } ;
per cases
( { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is empty or not { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is empty )
;
suppose S1:
{ [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is
empty
;
card { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } = 2 * (card (PairsOf X))now { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is empty assume
not
{ {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is
empty
;
contradictionthen consider a being
set such that A1:
a in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
consider x,
y being
Element of
union X such that
a = {x,[y,(union X)]}
and C1:
{x,y} in PairsOf X
by A1;
[x,y] in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by C1;
hence
contradiction
by S1;
verum end; hence
card { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } = 2
* (card (PairsOf X))
by S1, MnewE;
verum end; suppose S1:
not
{ [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } is
empty
;
card { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } = 2 * (card (PairsOf X))then consider b being
set such that Aa1:
b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
consider x,
y being
Element of
union X such that
b = [x,y]
and Ca1:
{x,y} in PairsOf X
by Aa1;
Ea1:
x in {x,y}
by TARSKI:def 2;
S1a:
union X <> {}
by Ca1, Ea1, TARSKI:def 4;
defpred S1[
set ,
set ]
means for
a,
b being
Element of
union X st
a in union X &
b in union X & $1
= {a,[b,(union X)]} holds
$2
= [a,b];
P:
for
c being
set st
c in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } holds
ex
d being
set st
(
d in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } &
S1[
c,
d] )
proof
let c be
set ;
( c in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } implies ex d being set st
( d in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } & S1[c,d] ) )
assume
c in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
;
ex d being set st
( d in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } & S1[c,d] )
then consider x,
y being
Element of
union X such that B2:
c = {x,[y,(union X)]}
and C2:
{x,y} in PairsOf X
;
take d =
[x,y];
( d in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } & S1[c,d] )
thus
d in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by C2;
S1[c,d]
thus
S1[
c,
d]
verumproof
let a,
b be
Element of
union X;
( a in union X & b in union X & c = {a,[b,(union X)]} implies d = [a,b] )
assume A3:
(
a in union X &
b in union X )
;
( not c = {a,[b,(union X)]} or d = [a,b] )
assume
c = {a,[b,(union X)]}
;
d = [a,b]
then
(
a = x &
b = y )
by B2, A3, Aux4;
hence
d = [a,b]
;
verum
end;
end; consider f being
Function of
{ {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } ,
{ [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } such that A1:
for
c being
set st
c in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } holds
S1[
c,
f . c]
from FUNCT_2:sch 1(P);
domf:
dom f = { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by S1, FUNCT_2:def 1;
B1:
f is
one-to-one
proof
let c1,
c2 be
set ;
FUNCT_1:def 4 ( not c1 in dom f or not c2 in dom f or not f . c1 = f . c2 or c1 = c2 )
assume that A2:
c1 in dom f
and B2:
c2 in dom f
and C2:
f . c1 = f . c2
;
c1 = c2
consider x1,
y1 being
Element of
union X such that E2:
c1 = {x1,[y1,(union X)]}
and
{x1,y1} in PairsOf X
by A2, domf;
consider x2,
y2 being
Element of
union X such that G2:
c2 = {x2,[y2,(union X)]}
and
{x2,y2} in PairsOf X
by B2, domf;
I2:
f . c1 = [x1,y1]
by A1, A2, domf, S1a, E2;
J2:
f . c2 = [x2,y2]
by A1, B2, domf, S1a, G2;
(
x1 = x2 &
y1 = y2 )
by C2, I2, J2, XTUPLE_0:1;
hence
c1 = c2
by E2, G2;
verum
end; C1a:
rng f = { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
proof
thus
rng f c= { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
XBOOLE_0:def 10 { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } c= rng fproof
let b be
set ;
TARSKI:def 3 ( not b in rng f or b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } )
assume
b in rng f
;
b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
then consider a being
set such that A2:
a in dom f
and B2:
b = f . a
by FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider x,
y being
Element of
union X such that C2:
a = {x,[y,(union X)]}
and D2:
{x,y} in PairsOf X
by A2, domf;
F2:
b = [x,y]
by B2, A2, A1, domf, S1a, C2;
thus
b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by F2, D2;
verum
end;
thus
{ [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } c= rng f
verumproof
let b be
set ;
TARSKI:def 3 ( not b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } or b in rng f )
assume A2:
b in { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
;
b in rng f
consider x,
y being
Element of
union X such that B2:
b = [x,y]
and C2:
{x,y} in PairsOf X
by A2;
set a =
{x,[y,(union X)]};
D2:
{x,[y,(union X)]} in { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by C2;
F2:
f . {x,[y,(union X)]} = b
by D2, A1, B2, S1a;
thus
b in rng f
by D2, F2, domf, FUNCT_1:3;
verum
end;
end; C1:
f is
onto
by C1a, FUNCT_2:def 3;
thus card { [x,y] where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X } =
card { {x,[y,(union X)]} where x, y is Element of union X : {x,y} in PairsOf X }
by B1, C1, S1, EULER_1:11
.=
2
* (card (PairsOf X))
by MnewE
;
verum end; end;