let G, H be finitely_colorable SimpleGraph; ( G c= H implies chromatic# G <= chromatic# H )
assume A:
G c= H
; chromatic# G <= chromatic# H
then reconsider S = Vertices G as Subset of (Vertices H) by ZFMISC_1:77;
set g = H SubgraphInducedBy S;
Aa:
G c= H SubgraphInducedBy S
by A, Sub0b;
consider C being finite Coloring of H such that
B:
card C = chromatic# H
by Lchro;
reconsider g = H SubgraphInducedBy S as finitely_colorable SimpleGraph ;
reconsider Cg = C | S as finite Coloring of g by Tsr0;
Ca:
Vertices G = Vertices g
by Sub0c;
Cb:
G c= g
reconsider Cg1 = Cg as a_partition of Vertices G ;
Cg1 is StableSet-wise
proof
let x be
set ;
SCMYCIEL:def 20 ( x in Cg1 implies x is StableSet of G )
assume A1:
x in Cg1
;
x is StableSet of G
reconsider xx =
x as
Subset of
(Vertices G) by A1;
reconsider xxx =
x as
Subset of
(Vertices g) by A1;
xx is
stable
proof
let x,
y be
set ;
SCMYCIEL:def 19 ( x <> y & x in xx & y in xx implies {x,y} nin G )
assume that A2:
x <> y
and B2:
x in xx
and C2:
y in xx
;
{x,y} nin G
D2:
xxx is
stable
by A1, LStableSetwise;
assume
{x,y} in G
;
contradiction
hence
contradiction
by Cb, A2, B2, C2, D2, Lstable;
verum
end;
hence
x is
StableSet of
G
;
verum
end;
then D:
card Cg >= chromatic# G
by Lchro;
card C >= card (C | S)
by MYCIELSK:8;
hence
chromatic# G <= chromatic# H
by D, B, XXREAL_0:2; verum