let E be set ; for S being semi-Thue-system of E holds ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega))
let S be semi-Thue-system of E; ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega))
A1:
==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega))) c= (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega))
proof
let x be
set ;
TARSKI:def 3 ( not x in ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega))) or x in (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega)) )
assume A2:
x in ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega)))
;
x in (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega))
then consider a,
b being
set such that A3:
(
a in E ^omega &
b in E ^omega )
and A4:
x = [a,b]
by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider a =
a,
b =
b as
Element of
E ^omega by A3;
a ==>. b,
S \/ (id (E ^omega))
by A2, A4, Def6;
then consider v,
w,
s1,
t1 being
Element of
E ^omega such that A5:
(
a = (v ^ s1) ^ w &
b = (v ^ t1) ^ w )
and A6:
s1 -->. t1,
S \/ (id (E ^omega))
by Def5;
A7:
[s1,t1] in S \/ (id (E ^omega))
by A6, Def4;
end;
(==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega)) c= ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega)))
hence
==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega))
by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 10; verum