let IT, PA, PB be a_partition of Y; ( ( for d being set holds
( d in IT iff d is_min_depend PA,PB ) ) implies for d being set holds
( d in IT iff d is_min_depend PB,PA ) )
for a being set st ( for d being set holds
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PA,PB ) ) holds
for d being set holds
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PB,PA )
proof
let a be
set ;
( ( for d being set holds
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PA,PB ) ) implies for d being set holds
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PB,PA ) )
assume A34:
for
d being
set holds
(
d in a iff
d is_min_depend PA,
PB )
;
for d being set holds
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PB,PA )
let d be
set ;
( d in a iff d is_min_depend PB,PA )
A35:
(
d in a iff
d is_min_depend PA,
PB )
by A34;
hence
(
d in a implies
d is_min_depend PB,
PA )
by A28;
( d is_min_depend PB,PA implies d in a )
assume
d is_min_depend PB,
PA
;
d in a
hence
d in a
by A31, A35;
verum
end;
hence
( ( for d being set holds
( d in IT iff d is_min_depend PA,PB ) ) implies for d being set holds
( d in IT iff d is_min_depend PB,PA ) )
; verum