let F be Field; for a, b, c, d being Element of (MPS F) holds
( a,b '||' c,d iff ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) ) )
let a, b, c, d be Element of (MPS F); ( a,b '||' c,d iff ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) ) )
A1:
( a,b '||' c,d implies ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) ) )
proof
assume
a,
b '||' c,
d
;
ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) )
then consider e,
f,
g,
h being
Element of
[: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] such that A2:
[a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h]
and A3:
(
(((e `1) - (f `1)) * ((g `2) - (h `2))) - (((g `1) - (h `1)) * ((e `2) - (f `2))) = 0. F &
(((e `1) - (f `1)) * ((g `3) - (h `3))) - (((g `1) - (h `1)) * ((e `3) - (f `3))) = 0. F &
(((e `2) - (f `2)) * ((g `3) - (h `3))) - (((g `2) - (h `2)) * ((e `3) - (f `3))) = 0. F )
by PARSP_1:12;
( ex
K being
Element of
F st
(
K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) &
K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) &
K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or (
(e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F &
(e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F &
(e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) )
by A3, Lm3;
hence
ex
e,
f,
g,
h being
Element of
[: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
(
[a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex
K being
Element of
F st
(
K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) &
K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) &
K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or (
(e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F &
(e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F &
(e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) )
by A2;
verum
end;
( ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) ) implies a,b '||' c,d )
proof
given e,
f,
g,
h being
Element of
[: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] such that A4:
[a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h]
and A5:
( ex
K being
Element of
F st
(
K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) &
K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) &
K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or (
(e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F &
(e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F &
(e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) )
;
a,b '||' c,d
A6:
(((e `2) - (f `2)) * ((g `3) - (h `3))) - (((g `2) - (h `2)) * ((e `3) - (f `3))) = 0. F
by A5, Lm3;
(
(((e `1) - (f `1)) * ((g `2) - (h `2))) - (((g `1) - (h `1)) * ((e `2) - (f `2))) = 0. F &
(((e `1) - (f `1)) * ((g `3) - (h `3))) - (((g `1) - (h `1)) * ((e `3) - (f `3))) = 0. F )
by A5, Lm3;
hence
a,
b '||' c,
d
by A4, A6, PARSP_1:12;
verum
end;
hence
( a,b '||' c,d iff ex e, f, g, h being Element of [: the carrier of F, the carrier of F, the carrier of F:] st
( [a,b,c,d] = [e,f,g,h] & ( ex K being Element of F st
( K * ((e `1) - (f `1)) = (g `1) - (h `1) & K * ((e `2) - (f `2)) = (g `2) - (h `2) & K * ((e `3) - (f `3)) = (g `3) - (h `3) ) or ( (e `1) - (f `1) = 0. F & (e `2) - (f `2) = 0. F & (e `3) - (f `3) = 0. F ) ) ) )
by A1; verum