let a, b, c be ordinal number ; ( a c= b iff c -Veblen a c= c -Veblen b )
set U = Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega);
set W = Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega);
A0:
for n being Nat holds
( n in omega & omega in Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega) & omega in Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega) )
by Unc1, ORDINAL1:def 12;
A1:
( b in Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega) & c in Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega) )
by LemT;
A2:
( a in Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega) & c in Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega) )
by LemT;
reconsider f = ((Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega)) -Veblen) . c as increasing Ordinal-Sequence of (Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega)) by A0, LemT, Th23;
reconsider g = ((Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega)) -Veblen) . c as increasing Ordinal-Sequence of (Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega)) by A0, LemT, Th23;
A3:
( dom f = On (Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega)) & dom g = On (Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega)) )
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
A4:
( b in On (Tarski-Class ((c \/ b) \/ omega)) & a in On (Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega)) )
by A1, A2, ORDINAL1:def 9;
assume A5:
( c -Veblen a c= c -Veblen b & a c/= b )
; contradiction
then A6:
b in a
by ORDINAL1:16;
then A7:
b in Tarski-Class ((c \/ a) \/ omega)
by A2, ORDINAL1:10;
g . b in g . a
by A3, A4, A6, ORDINAL2:def 12;
then
c -Veblen b in c -Veblen a
by A0, A1, A2, A7, Th25;
then
c -Veblen b in c -Veblen b
by A5;
hence
contradiction
; verum