let M1, M2 be Matrix of n,m,D; ( ( len pD = width M & len M1 = len M & width M1 = width M & ( for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices M holds
( ( i <> l implies M1 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M1 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) & len M2 = len M & width M2 = width M & ( for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices M holds
( ( i <> l implies M2 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M2 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) implies M1 = M2 ) & ( not len pD = width M & M1 = M & M2 = M implies M1 = M2 ) )
thus
( len pD = width M & len M1 = len M & width M1 = width M & ( for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices M holds
( ( i <> l implies M1 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M1 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) & len M2 = len M & width M2 = width M & ( for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices M holds
( ( i <> l implies M2 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M2 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) implies M1 = M2 )
( not len pD = width M & M1 = M & M2 = M implies M1 = M2 )proof
assume
len pD = width M
;
( not len M1 = len M or not width M1 = width M or ex i, j being Nat st
( [i,j] in Indices M & not ( ( i <> l implies M1 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M1 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) or not len M2 = len M or not width M2 = width M or ex i, j being Nat st
( [i,j] in Indices M & not ( ( i <> l implies M2 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M2 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) or M1 = M2 )
assume that A17:
len M1 = len M
and A18:
width M1 = width M
and A19:
for
i,
j being
Nat st
[i,j] in Indices M holds
( (
i <> l implies
M1 * (
i,
j)
= M * (
i,
j) ) & (
i = l implies
M1 * (
l,
j)
= pD . j ) )
;
( not len M2 = len M or not width M2 = width M or ex i, j being Nat st
( [i,j] in Indices M & not ( ( i <> l implies M2 * (i,j) = M * (i,j) ) & ( i = l implies M2 * (l,j) = pD . j ) ) ) or M1 = M2 )
assume that
len M2 = len M
and
width M2 = width M
and A20:
for
i,
j being
Nat st
[i,j] in Indices M holds
( (
i <> l implies
M2 * (
i,
j)
= M * (
i,
j) ) & (
i = l implies
M2 * (
l,
j)
= pD . j ) )
;
M1 = M2
for
i,
j being
Nat st
[i,j] in Indices M1 holds
M1 * (
i,
j)
= M2 * (
i,
j)
proof
let i,
j be
Nat;
( [i,j] in Indices M1 implies M1 * (i,j) = M2 * (i,j) )
assume
[i,j] in Indices M1
;
M1 * (i,j) = M2 * (i,j)
then A21:
[i,j] in Indices M
by A17, A18, MATRIX_4:55;
then A22:
(
i = l implies
M1 * (
l,
j)
= pD . j )
by A19;
A23:
(
i <> l implies
M2 * (
i,
j)
= M * (
i,
j) )
by A20, A21;
(
i <> l implies
M1 * (
i,
j)
= M * (
i,
j) )
by A19, A21;
hence
M1 * (
i,
j)
= M2 * (
i,
j)
by A20, A21, A22, A23;
verum
end;
hence
M1 = M2
by MATRIX_1:27;
verum
end;
thus
( not len pD = width M & M1 = M & M2 = M implies M1 = M2 )
; verum