let f be PartFunc of REAL,REAL; for g being Real st f is convergent_in-infty holds
( lim_in-infty f = g iff for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1 )
let g be Real; ( f is convergent_in-infty implies ( lim_in-infty f = g iff for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1 ) )
assume A1:
f is convergent_in-infty
; ( lim_in-infty f = g iff for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1 )
thus
( lim_in-infty f = g implies for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1 )
( ( for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1 ) implies lim_in-infty f = g )proof
deffunc H1(
Element of
NAT )
-> Element of
REAL =
- $1;
assume A2:
lim_in-infty f = g
;
for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1
consider s1 being
Real_Sequence such that A3:
for
n being
Element of
NAT holds
s1 . n = H1(
n)
from SEQ_1:sch 1();
given g1 being
Real such that A4:
0 < g1
and A5:
for
r being
Real ex
r1 being
Real st
(
r1 < r &
r1 in dom f &
abs ((f . r1) - g) >= g1 )
;
contradiction
defpred S1[
Element of
NAT ,
real number ]
means ( $2
< - $1 & $2
in dom f &
abs ((f . $2) - g) >= g1 );
A6:
for
n being
Element of
NAT ex
r being
Real st
S1[
n,
r]
by A5;
consider s being
Real_Sequence such that A7:
for
n being
Element of
NAT holds
S1[
n,
s . n]
from FUNCT_2:sch 3(A6);
then A8:
rng s c= dom f
by TARSKI:def 3;
then
s is
divergent_to-infty
by A3, Th48, Th70;
then
(
f /* s is
convergent &
lim (f /* s) = g )
by A1, A2, A8, Def13;
then consider n being
Element of
NAT such that A9:
for
m being
Element of
NAT st
n <= m holds
abs (((f /* s) . m) - g) < g1
by A4, SEQ_2:def 7;
abs (((f /* s) . n) - g) < g1
by A9;
then
abs ((f . (s . n)) - g) < g1
by A8, FUNCT_2:108;
hence
contradiction
by A7;
verum
end;
assume A10:
for g1 being Real st 0 < g1 holds
ex r being Real st
for r1 being Real st r1 < r & r1 in dom f holds
abs ((f . r1) - g) < g1
; lim_in-infty f = g
hence
lim_in-infty f = g
by A1, Def13; verum