let G be finite Group; for p being natural prime number holds
( ( for H being Subgroup of G st H is p -group holds
ex P being Subgroup of G st
( P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P ) ) & ( for P1, P2 being Subgroup of G st P1 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p holds
P1,P2 are_conjugated ) )
let p be natural prime number ; ( ( for H being Subgroup of G st H is p -group holds
ex P being Subgroup of G st
( P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P ) ) & ( for P1, P2 being Subgroup of G st P1 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p holds
P1,P2 are_conjugated ) )
reconsider p9 = p as prime Element of NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
A1:
for H, P being Subgroup of G st H is p -group & P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p holds
ex g being Element of G st carr H c= carr (P |^ g)
thus
for H being Subgroup of G st H is p -group holds
ex P being Subgroup of G st
( P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P )
for P1, P2 being Subgroup of G st P1 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p holds
P1,P2 are_conjugated proof
let H be
Subgroup of
G;
( H is p -group implies ex P being Subgroup of G st
( P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P ) )
consider P9 being
strict Subgroup of
G such that A12:
P9 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p
by Th12;
assume
H is
p -group
;
ex P being Subgroup of G st
( P is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P )
then consider g being
Element of
G such that A13:
carr H c= carr (P9 |^ g)
by A1, A12;
set P =
P9 |^ g;
take
P9 |^ g
;
( P9 |^ g is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & H is Subgroup of P9 |^ g )
set H2 =
P9 |^ g;
reconsider H2 =
P9 |^ g as
finite Group ;
A14:
card P9 = card (P9 |^ g)
by GROUP_3:66;
P9 is
p -group
by A12, Def19;
then consider H1 being
finite Group such that A15:
P9 = H1
and A16:
H1 is
p -group
;
ex
r being
natural number st
card H1 = p |^ r
by A16, Def17;
then A17:
H2 is
p -group
by A15, A14, Def17;
A18:
not
p divides index P9
by A12, Def19;
(card (P9 |^ g)) * (index (P9 |^ g)) =
card G
by GROUP_2:147
.=
(card (P9 |^ g)) * (index P9)
by A14, GROUP_2:147
;
then
not
p divides index (P9 |^ g)
by A18, XCMPLX_1:5;
hence
P9 |^ g is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p
by A17, Def19;
H is Subgroup of P9 |^ g
thus
H is
Subgroup of
P9 |^ g
by A13, GROUP_2:57;
verum
end;
let P1, P2 be Subgroup of G; ( P1 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p & P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p implies P1,P2 are_conjugated )
assume A19:
P1 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p
; ( not P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p or P1,P2 are_conjugated )
then A20:
P1 is p -group
by Def19;
then consider H1 being finite Group such that
A21:
P1 = H1
and
A22:
H1 is p -group
;
A23:
not p divides index P1
by A19, Def19;
consider r1 being natural number such that
A24:
card H1 = p |^ r1
by A22, Def17;
assume A25:
P2 is_Sylow_p-subgroup_of_prime p
; P1,P2 are_conjugated
then A26:
not p divides index P2
by Def19;
P2 is p -group
by A25, Def19;
then consider H2 being finite Group such that
A27:
P2 = H2
and
A28:
H2 is p -group
;
consider r2 being natural number such that
A29:
card H2 = p |^ r2
by A28, Def17;
A30:
card G = (card P2) * (index P2)
by GROUP_2:147;
then A31:
(p |^ r1) * (index P1) = (p |^ r2) * (index P2)
by A21, A24, A27, A29, GROUP_2:147;
now assume A32:
r1 <> r2
;
contradiction end;
then A41:
card (carr P1) = card (carr P2)
by A21, A24, A27, A29;
consider g being Element of G such that
A42:
carr P1 c= carr (P2 |^ g)
by A1, A20, A25;
card (carr P2) =
card P2
.=
card (P2 |^ g)
by GROUP_3:66
.=
card (carr (P2 |^ g))
;
then
multMagma(# the carrier of P1, the multF of P1 #) = multMagma(# the carrier of (P2 |^ g), the multF of (P2 |^ g) #)
by A42, A41, CARD_FIN:1, GROUP_2:59;
hence
P1,P2 are_conjugated
by GROUP_3:def 11; verum