let A, a, b be set ; ( <*a,b*> in 2 -tuples_on A implies ( a in A & b in A ) )
assume
<*a,b*> in 2 -tuples_on A
; ( a in A & b in A )
then A1:
ex a9, b9 being set st
( a9 in A & b9 in A & <*a,b*> = <*a9,b9*> )
by Th157;
( <*a,b*> . 1 = a & <*a,b*> . 2 = b )
by FINSEQ_1:44;
hence
( a in A & b in A )
by A1, FINSEQ_1:44; verum