let loc be Nat; :: thesis: not SCM-goto loc is halting
set f = the Object-Kind of SCM;
set s = the SCM-State;
assume A1: SCM-goto loc is halting ; :: thesis: contradiction
reconsider a3 = loc as Element of NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
reconsider V = SCM-goto loc as Element of SCM-Instr ;
set t = the SCM-State +* (NAT .--> (succ a3));
A2: dom the SCM-State = the carrier of SCM by PARTFUN1:def 2;
A3: dom (NAT .--> (succ a3)) = {NAT} by FUNCOP_1:13;
then NAT in dom (NAT .--> (succ a3)) by TARSKI:def 1;
then A4: ( the SCM-State +* (NAT .--> (succ a3))) . NAT = (NAT .--> (succ a3)) . NAT by FUNCT_4:13
.= succ a3 by FUNCOP_1:72 ;
A5: for x being set st x in dom the Object-Kind of SCM holds
( the SCM-State +* (NAT .--> (succ a3))) . x in the Object-Kind of SCM . x
proof end;
A8: {NAT} c= SCM-Memory by AMI_2:22, ZFMISC_1:31;
A9: dom ( the SCM-State +* (NAT .--> (succ a3))) = (dom the SCM-State) \/ (dom (NAT .--> (succ a3))) by FUNCT_4:def 1
.= SCM-Memory \/ (dom (NAT .--> (succ a3))) by A2
.= SCM-Memory \/ {NAT} by FUNCOP_1:13
.= SCM-Memory by A8, XBOOLE_1:12 ;
dom the Object-Kind of SCM = SCM-Memory by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then reconsider t = the SCM-State +* (NAT .--> (succ a3)) as State of SCM by A9, A5, FUNCT_1:def 14, PARTFUN1:def 2, RELAT_1:def 18;
reconsider w = t as SCM-State by CARD_3:107;
dom (NAT .--> loc) = {NAT} by FUNCOP_1:13;
then NAT in dom (NAT .--> loc) by TARSKI:def 1;
then A10: (w +* (NAT .--> loc)) . NAT = (NAT .--> loc) . NAT by FUNCT_4:13
.= loc by FUNCOP_1:72 ;
6 is Element of Segm 9 by NAT_1:44;
then w +* (NAT .--> loc) = SCM-Chg (w,(V jump_address)) by AMI_2:18
.= SCM-Exec-Res (V,w) by AMI_2:def 13
.= Exec ((SCM-goto loc),t) by AMI_2:def 14
.= t by A1, EXTPRO_1:def 3 ;
hence contradiction by A4, A10; :: thesis: verum