let X be non empty TopSpace; :: thesis: for X1, X2, X0 being non empty SubSpace of X holds
( ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) & ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 ) & ( X0 misses X1 union X2 implies ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) & ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 implies X0 misses X1 union X2 ) )

let X1, X2, X0 be non empty SubSpace of X; :: thesis: ( ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) & ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 ) & ( X0 misses X1 union X2 implies ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) & ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 implies X0 misses X1 union X2 ) )
reconsider A0 = the carrier of X0 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
reconsider A1 = the carrier of X1 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
reconsider A2 = the carrier of X2 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
A1: ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) )
proof end;
A4: ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 )
proof end;
hence ( X1 union X2 misses X0 iff ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) by A1; :: thesis: ( X0 misses X1 union X2 iff ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) )
thus ( X0 misses X1 union X2 iff ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) by A1, A4; :: thesis: verum