let f be complex-valued Function; :: thesis: ( (abs f) " {0} = f " {0} & (- f) " {0} = f " {0} )
now end;
hence (abs f) " {0} = f " {0} by TARSKI:2; :: thesis: (- f) " {0} = f " {0}
now
let c be set ; :: thesis: ( ( c in (- f) " {0} implies c in f " {0} ) & ( c in f " {0} implies c in (- f) " {0} ) )
thus ( c in (- f) " {0} implies c in f " {0} ) :: thesis: ( c in f " {0} implies c in (- f) " {0} )
proof end;
assume A7: c in f " {0} ; :: thesis: c in (- f) " {0}
then f . c in {0} by FUNCT_1:def 13;
then f . c = 0 by TARSKI:def 1;
then (- f) . c = - 0 by VALUED_1:8;
then A8: (- f) . c in {0} by TARSKI:def 1;
c in dom f by A7, FUNCT_1:def 13;
then c in dom (- f) by VALUED_1:8;
hence c in (- f) " {0} by A8, FUNCT_1:def 13; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence (- f) " {0} = f " {0} by TARSKI:2; :: thesis: verum