A1: ex h being ManySortedSet of NAT st
( 0 -BitBorrowOutput (x,y) = h . 0 & h . 0 = [<*>,((0 -tuples_on BOOLEAN) --> TRUE)] & ( for n being Nat holds h . (n + 1) = BorrowOutput ((x . (n + 1)),(y . (n + 1)),(h . n)) ) ) by Def3;
defpred S1[ Element of NAT ] means n -BitBorrowOutput (x,y) is pair ;
A2: S1[ 0 ] by A1;
A3: for n being Element of NAT st S1[n] holds
S1[n + 1]
proof
let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( S1[n] implies S1[n + 1] )
(n + 1) -BitBorrowOutput (x,y) = BorrowOutput ((x . (n + 1)),(y . (n + 1)),(n -BitBorrowOutput (x,y))) by Th7
.= [<*[<*(x . (n + 1)),(y . (n + 1))*>,and2a],[<*(y . (n + 1)),(n -BitBorrowOutput (x,y))*>,and2],[<*(x . (n + 1)),(n -BitBorrowOutput (x,y))*>,and2a]*>,or3] ;
hence ( S1[n] implies S1[n + 1] ) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
for n being Element of NAT holds S1[n] from NAT_1:sch 1(A2, A3);
hence n -BitBorrowOutput (x,y) is pair ; :: thesis: verum