let L be non empty complete Poset; :: thesis: ( Scott-Convergence L is (ITERATED_LIMITS) implies L is continuous )
assume A1: Scott-Convergence L is (ITERATED_LIMITS) ; :: thesis: L is continuous
set C = Scott-Convergence L;
now
let I be non empty set ; :: thesis: ( I in the_universe_of the carrier of L implies for K being V5() ManySortedSet of I st ( for j being Element of I holds K . j in the_universe_of the carrier of L ) holds
for F being DoubleIndexedSet of K,L st ( for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ) holds
Inf = Sup )

assume A2: I in the_universe_of the carrier of L ; :: thesis: for K being V5() ManySortedSet of I st ( for j being Element of I holds K . j in the_universe_of the carrier of L ) holds
for F being DoubleIndexedSet of K,L st ( for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ) holds
Inf = Sup

let K be V5() ManySortedSet of I; :: thesis: ( ( for j being Element of I holds K . j in the_universe_of the carrier of L ) implies for F being DoubleIndexedSet of K,L st ( for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ) holds
Inf = Sup )

assume A3: for j being Element of I holds K . j in the_universe_of the carrier of L ; :: thesis: for F being DoubleIndexedSet of K,L st ( for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ) holds
Inf = Sup

let F be DoubleIndexedSet of K,L; :: thesis: ( ( for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ) implies Inf = Sup )
assume A4: for j being Element of I holds rng (F . j) is directed ; :: thesis: Inf = Sup
set x = Inf ;
A5: Inf >= Sup by WAYBEL_5:16;
[:I,I:] c= [:I,I:] ;
then reconsider r = [:I,I:] as Relation of I ;
dom F = I by PARTFUN1:def 4;
then reconsider f = Sups as Function of I,the carrier of L ;
set X = NetStr(# I,r,f #);
A6: for i, j being Element of NetStr(# I,r,f #) holds i <= j
proof
let i, j be Element of NetStr(# I,r,f #); :: thesis: i <= j
[i,j] in the InternalRel of NetStr(# I,r,f #) by ZFMISC_1:106;
hence i <= j by ORDERS_2:def 9; :: thesis: verum
end;
A7: NetStr(# I,r,f #) is transitive
proof
let x, y, z be Element of NetStr(# I,r,f #); :: according to YELLOW_0:def 2 :: thesis: ( not x <= y or not y <= z or x <= z )
assume that
x <= y and
y <= z ; :: thesis: x <= z
thus x <= z by A6; :: thesis: verum
end;
NetStr(# I,r,f #) is directed
proof
let x, y be Element of NetStr(# I,r,f #); :: according to YELLOW_6:def 5 :: thesis: ex b1 being Element of the carrier of NetStr(# I,r,f #) st
( x <= b1 & y <= b1 )

take x ; :: thesis: ( x <= x & y <= x )
thus ( x <= x & y <= x ) by A6; :: thesis: verum
end;
then reconsider X = NetStr(# I,r,f #) as strict net of L by A7;
deffunc H1( Element of I) -> non empty strict NetStr of L = Net-Str (K . $1),(F . $1);
consider J being ManySortedSet of I such that
A8: for i being Element of I holds J . i = H1(i) from PBOOLE:sch 5();
for i being set st i in the carrier of X holds
J . i is net of L
proof
let i be set ; :: thesis: ( i in the carrier of X implies J . i is net of L )
assume i in the carrier of X ; :: thesis: J . i is net of L
then reconsider i9 = i as Element of I ;
reconsider rFi = rng (F . i9) as Subset of L ;
A9: rFi is directed by A4;
J . i9 = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) by A8;
hence J . i is net of L by A9, Th20; :: thesis: verum
end;
then reconsider J = J as net_set of the carrier of X,L by YELLOW_6:33;
A10: for j being set st j in I holds
ex R being 1-sorted st
( R = J . j & K . j = the carrier of R )
proof
let i be set ; :: thesis: ( i in I implies ex R being 1-sorted st
( R = J . i & K . i = the carrier of R ) )

assume i in I ; :: thesis: ex R being 1-sorted st
( R = J . i & K . i = the carrier of R )

then reconsider i9 = i as Element of I ;
take R = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9); :: thesis: ( R = J . i & K . i = the carrier of R )
thus R = J . i by A8; :: thesis: K . i = the carrier of R
thus K . i = the carrier of R by Def10; :: thesis: verum
end;
A11: doms F = K by YELLOW_7:45
.= Carrier J by A10, PRALG_1:def 13 ;
A12: dom (Frege F) = product (doms F) by PARTFUN1:def 4;
then A13: dom (Infs ) = product (doms F) by FUNCT_2:def 1;
A14: for i being Element of X holds J . i in NetUniv L
proof
let i be Element of X; :: thesis: J . i in NetUniv L
reconsider i9 = i as Element of I ;
A15: J . i = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) by A8;
then reconsider Ji = J . i as strict net of L ;
K . i9 in the_universe_of the carrier of L by A3;
then the carrier of Ji in the_universe_of the carrier of L by A15, Def10;
hence J . i in NetUniv L by YELLOW_6:def 14; :: thesis: verum
end;
A16: for i being Element of X holds [(J . i),(X . i)] in Scott-Convergence L
proof
let i be Element of X; :: thesis: [(J . i),(X . i)] in Scott-Convergence L
reconsider i9 = i as Element of I ;
A17: J . i = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) by A8;
then reconsider Ji = J . i as reflexive monotone net of L ;
A18: J . i in NetUniv L by A14;
i in I ;
then i9 in dom F by PARTFUN1:def 4;
then X . i = Sup by WAYBEL_5:def 1
.= Sup by A17, Def10
.= sup Ji by WAYBEL_2:def 1
.= lim_inf Ji by Th22 ;
then X . i is_S-limit_of J . i by Def7;
hence [(J . i),(X . i)] in Scott-Convergence L by A17, A18, Def8; :: thesis: verum
end;
A19: X in NetUniv L by A2, YELLOW_6:def 14;
then A20: Iterated J in NetUniv L by A14, YELLOW_6:34;
deffunc H2( Element of (Iterated J)) -> set = { ((Iterated J) . p) where p is Element of (Iterated J) : p >= $1 } ;
the carrier of (Iterated J) = [:the carrier of X,(product (Carrier J)):] by YELLOW_6:35;
then reconsider G = the mapping of (Iterated J) as Function of [:the carrier of X,(product (doms F)):],the carrier of L by A11;
deffunc H3( Element of X, Element of product (doms F)) -> set = { (G . i,$2) where i is Element of X : i >= $1 } ;
defpred S1[ set ] means verum;
deffunc H4( Element of product (doms F)) -> Element of the carrier of L = "/\" (rng ((Frege F) . $1)),L;
deffunc H5( Element of X, Element of product (doms F)) -> Element of the carrier of L = "/\" H3($1,$2),L;
set D = { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } ;
set D9 = { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ;
set E9 = { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ;
A21: for i being Element of X
for g being Element of product (doms F) holds H4(g) = H5(i,g)
proof
let j be Element of X; :: thesis: for g being Element of product (doms F) holds H4(g) = H5(j,g)
let g be Element of product (doms F); :: thesis: H4(g) = H5(j,g)
for y being set holds
( y in H3(j,g) iff ex x being set st
( x in dom ((Frege F) . g) & y = ((Frege F) . g) . x ) )
proof
let y be set ; :: thesis: ( y in H3(j,g) iff ex x being set st
( x in dom ((Frege F) . g) & y = ((Frege F) . g) . x ) )

g in product (Carrier J) by A11;
then A22: g in the carrier of (product J) by YELLOW_1:def 4;
hereby :: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom ((Frege F) . g) & y = ((Frege F) . g) . x ) implies y in H3(j,g) )
assume y in H3(j,g) ; :: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom ((Frege F) . g) & ((Frege F) . g) . x = y )

then consider i being Element of X such that
A23: y = G . i,g and
i >= j ;
reconsider x = i as set ;
take x = x; :: thesis: ( x in dom ((Frege F) . g) & ((Frege F) . g) . x = y )
reconsider i9 = i as Element of I ;
A24: i in I ;
then A25: i9 in dom F by PARTFUN1:def 4;
thus x in dom ((Frege F) . g) by A24, PARTFUN1:def 4; :: thesis: ((Frege F) . g) . x = y
thus ((Frege F) . g) . x = (F . i9) . (g . i) by A12, A25, WAYBEL_5:9
.= the mapping of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) . (g . i) by Def10
.= the mapping of (J . i) . (g . i) by A8
.= y by A22, A23, YELLOW_6:def 16 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
given x being set such that A26: x in dom ((Frege F) . g) and
A27: y = ((Frege F) . g) . x ; :: thesis: y in H3(j,g)
A28: x in dom F by A12, A26, WAYBEL_5:8;
reconsider i9 = x as Element of I by A26;
reconsider i = i9 as Element of X ;
A29: i >= j by A6;
y = (F . x) . (g . x) by A12, A27, A28, WAYBEL_5:9
.= the mapping of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) . (g . i) by Def10
.= the mapping of (J . i) . (g . i) by A8
.= G . i,g by A22, YELLOW_6:def 16 ;
hence y in H3(j,g) by A29; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence H4(g) = H5(j,g) by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
A30: { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } = { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] }
proof
A31: the carrier of (Iterated J) = [:the carrier of X,(product (Carrier J)):] by YELLOW_6:35;
A32: for p being Element of (Iterated J)
for i being Element of X
for g being Element of product (doms F) st p = [i,g] holds
"/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L
proof
let p be Element of (Iterated J); :: thesis: for i being Element of X
for g being Element of product (doms F) st p = [i,g] holds
"/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L

let i be Element of X; :: thesis: for g being Element of product (doms F) st p = [i,g] holds
"/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L

let g be Element of product (doms F); :: thesis: ( p = [i,g] implies "/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L )
assume A33: p = [i,g] ; :: thesis: "/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L
A34: RelStr(# the carrier of (Iterated J),the InternalRel of (Iterated J) #) = RelStr(# the carrier of [:X,(product J):],the InternalRel of [:X,(product J):] #) by YELLOW_6:def 16;
reconsider g9 = g as Element of (product J) by A11, YELLOW_1:def 4;
g9 in the carrier of (product J) ;
then A35: g9 in product (Carrier J) by YELLOW_1:def 4;
reconsider i9 = i as Element of X ;
for i being set st i in the carrier of X holds
ex R being RelStr ex xi, yi being Element of R st
( R = J . i & xi = g9 . i & yi = g9 . i & xi <= yi )
proof
let i be set ; :: thesis: ( i in the carrier of X implies ex R being RelStr ex xi, yi being Element of R st
( R = J . i & xi = g9 . i & yi = g9 . i & xi <= yi ) )

assume i in the carrier of X ; :: thesis: ex R being RelStr ex xi, yi being Element of R st
( R = J . i & xi = g9 . i & yi = g9 . i & xi <= yi )

then reconsider ii = i as Element of X ;
reconsider i9 = ii as Element of I ;
A36: J . i = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) by A8;
set R = Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9);
g9 . ii in the carrier of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) by A36;
then reconsider x = g9 . i as Element of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) ;
take Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) ; :: thesis: ex xi, yi being Element of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) st
( Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) = J . i & xi = g9 . i & yi = g9 . i & xi <= yi )

take x ; :: thesis: ex yi being Element of (Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9)) st
( Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) = J . i & x = g9 . i & yi = g9 . i & x <= yi )

take x ; :: thesis: ( Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) = J . i & x = g9 . i & x = g9 . i & x <= x )
x <= x ;
hence ( Net-Str (K . i9),(F . i9) = J . i & x = g9 . i & x = g9 . i & x <= x ) by A8; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A37: g9 <= g9 by A35, YELLOW_1:def 4;
H3(i,g) c= H2(p)
proof
let u be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not u in H3(i,g) or u in H2(p) )
assume u in H3(i,g) ; :: thesis: u in H2(p)
then consider j being Element of X such that
A38: u = the mapping of (Iterated J) . j,g and
A39: j >= i ;
reconsider j9 = j as Element of X ;
reconsider q = [j,g] as Element of (Iterated J) by A11, YELLOW_6:35;
[j9,g9] >= [i9,g9] by A37, A39, YELLOW_3:11;
then A40: q >= p by A33, A34, Lm1;
u = (Iterated J) . q by A38;
hence u in H2(p) by A40; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A41: "/\" H2(p),L <= "/\" H3(i,g),L by WAYBEL_7:3;
defpred S2[ Element of X] means $1 >= i;
deffunc H6( Element of X) -> Element of the carrier of L = G . $1,g;
{ H6(k) where k is Element of X : S2[k] } is Subset of L from DOMAIN_1:sch 8();
then reconsider A = H3(i,g) as Subset of L ;
defpred S3[ Element of (Iterated J)] means $1 >= p;
deffunc H7( Element of (Iterated J)) -> Element of the carrier of L = (Iterated J) . $1;
{ H7(z) where z is Element of (Iterated J) : S3[z] } is Subset of L from DOMAIN_1:sch 8();
then reconsider B = H2(p) as Subset of L ;
B is_coarser_than A
proof
let b be Element of L; :: according to YELLOW_4:def 2 :: thesis: ( not b in B or ex b1 being Element of the carrier of L st
( b1 in A & b1 <= b ) )

assume b in B ; :: thesis: ex b1 being Element of the carrier of L st
( b1 in A & b1 <= b )

then consider q being Element of (Iterated J) such that
A42: b = (Iterated J) . q and
A43: p <= q ;
consider k being Element of X, f being Element of product (Carrier J) such that
A44: q = [k,f] by A31, DOMAIN_1:9;
reconsider k9 = k as Element of X ;
set a = the mapping of (Iterated J) . k,g;
the mapping of (Iterated J) . k,g = G . k,g ;
then reconsider a = the mapping of (Iterated J) . k,g as Element of L ;
take a ; :: thesis: ( a in A & a <= b )
reconsider f9 = f as Element of (product J) by YELLOW_1:def 4;
A45: [k9,f9] >= [i9,g9] by A33, A34, A43, A44, Lm1;
then i <= k by YELLOW_3:11;
hence a in A ; :: thesis: a <= b
reconsider k9 = k as Element of I ;
set N = Net-Str (K . k9),(F . k9);
A46: J . k = Net-Str (K . k9),(F . k9) by A8;
reconsider g9k = g9 . k, f9k = f9 . k as Element of (Net-Str (K . k9),(F . k9)) by A8;
A47: b = (Net-Str (K . k9),(F . k9)) . f9k by A42, A44, A46, YELLOW_6:36;
reconsider kg = [k,g] as Element of (Iterated J) by A11, YELLOW_6:35;
A48: a = (Iterated J) . kg
.= (Net-Str (K . k9),(F . k9)) . g9k by A46, YELLOW_6:36 ;
g9 <= f9 by A45, YELLOW_3:11;
then g9 . k <= f9 . k by WAYBEL_3:28;
hence a <= b by A46, A47, A48, Def10; :: thesis: verum
end;
then "/\" H3(i,g),L <= "/\" H2(p),L by Th1;
hence "/\" H2(p),L = "/\" H3(i,g),L by A41, YELLOW_0:def 3; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } c= { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } :: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } c= { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum }
proof
let e be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not e in { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } or e in { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } )
assume e in { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } ; :: thesis: e in { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] }
then consider p being Element of (Iterated J) such that
A49: e = "/\" H2(p),L ;
consider j being Element of X, g being Element of product (doms F) such that
A50: p = [j,g] by A11, A31, DOMAIN_1:9;
e = "/\" H3(j,g),L by A32, A49, A50;
hence e in { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
let e be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not e in { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } or e in { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } )
assume e in { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ; :: thesis: e in { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum }
then consider i being Element of X, g being Element of product (doms F) such that
A51: e = "/\" H3(i,g),L ;
reconsider j = [i,g] as Element of (Iterated J) by A11, YELLOW_6:35;
e = "/\" H2(j),L by A32, A51;
hence e in { ("/\" H2(j),L) where j is Element of (Iterated J) : verum } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A52: { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } = { H5(i,g) where i is Element of X, g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } from WAYBEL11:sch 1(A21);
for y being set holds
( y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } iff ex x being set st
( x in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . x ) )
proof
let y be set ; :: thesis: ( y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } iff ex x being set st
( x in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . x ) )

thus ( y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . x ) ) :: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . x ) implies y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } )
proof
assume y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ; :: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . x )

then consider g being Element of product (doms F) such that
A53: y = "/\" (rng ((Frege F) . g)),L ;
take g ; :: thesis: ( g in dom (Infs ) & y = (Infs ) . g )
thus A54: g in dom (Infs ) by A13; :: thesis: y = (Infs ) . g
thus y = //\ ((Frege F) . g),L by A53, YELLOW_2:def 6
.= (Infs ) . g by A54, WAYBEL_5:def 2 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
given x being set such that A55: x in dom (Infs ) and
A56: y = (Infs ) . x ; :: thesis: y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] }
reconsider x = x as Element of product (doms F) by A55, PARTFUN1:def 4;
y = //\ ((Frege F) . x),L by A55, A56, WAYBEL_5:def 2
.= "/\" (rng ((Frege F) . x)),L by YELLOW_2:def 6 ;
hence y in { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then rng (Infs ) = { H4(g) where g is Element of product (doms F) : S1[g] } by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then A57: Sup = lim_inf (Iterated J) by A30, A52, YELLOW_2:def 5;
reconsider x9 = Inf as Element of L ;
set X1 = { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } ;
set X2 = { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } ;
A58: { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } = { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum }
proof
A59: for j being Element of X holds Inf = "/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L
proof
let j be Element of X; :: thesis: Inf = "/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L
set X3 = { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ;
for e being set holds
( e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } iff ex u being set st
( u in dom (Sups ) & e = (Sups ) . u ) )
proof
let e be set ; :: thesis: ( e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } iff ex u being set st
( u in dom (Sups ) & e = (Sups ) . u ) )

hereby :: thesis: ( ex u being set st
( u in dom (Sups ) & e = (Sups ) . u ) implies e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } )
assume e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ; :: thesis: ex u being set st
( u in dom (Sups ) & e = (Sups ) . u )

then consider i being Element of X such that
A60: e = X . i and
i >= j ;
reconsider u = i as set ;
take u = u; :: thesis: ( u in dom (Sups ) & e = (Sups ) . u )
u in I ;
hence u in dom (Sups ) by FUNCT_2:def 1; :: thesis: e = (Sups ) . u
thus e = (Sups ) . u by A60; :: thesis: verum
end;
given u being set such that A61: u in dom (Sups ) and
A62: e = (Sups ) . u ; :: thesis: e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j }
reconsider i = u as Element of X by A61, FUNCT_2:def 1;
A63: i >= j by A6;
e = X . i by A62;
hence e in { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } by A63; :: thesis: verum
end;
then rng (Sups ) = { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } by FUNCT_1:def 5;
hence Inf = "/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L by YELLOW_2:def 6; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } c= { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } :: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } c= { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum }
proof
let u be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not u in { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } or u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } )
assume u in { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } ; :: thesis: u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum }
then ex j being Element of X st u = "/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L ;
then u = Inf by A59;
hence u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
let u be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } or u in { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } )
consider j being Element of X;
assume u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } ; :: thesis: u in { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum }
then ex j being Element of X st u = Inf ;
then u = "/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L by A59;
hence u in { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } ; :: thesis: verum
end;
now
let u be set ; :: thesis: ( u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } iff u in {(Inf )} )
( u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } iff ex j9 being Element of X st u = Inf ) ;
then ( u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } iff u = Inf ) ;
hence ( u in { (Inf ) where j9 is Element of X : verum } iff u in {(Inf )} ) by TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
then "\/" { ("/\" { (X . i) where i is Element of X : i >= j } ,L) where j is Element of X : verum } ,L = sup {x9} by A58, TARSKI:2
.= Inf by YELLOW_0:39 ;
then Inf <= lim_inf X ;
then Inf is_S-limit_of X by Def7;
then [X,(Inf )] in Scott-Convergence L by A19, Def8;
then [(Iterated J),(Inf )] in Scott-Convergence L by A1, A16, YELLOW_6:def 26;
then Inf is_S-limit_of Iterated J by A20, Def8;
then Inf <= Sup by A57, Def7;
hence Inf = Sup by A5, ORDERS_2:25; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence L is continuous by WAYBEL_5:18; :: thesis: verum