let r be Real; ( 0 < r & r < PI implies ( arccot (cot . r) = r & arccot (cot r) = r ) )
assume that
A1:
0 < r
and
A2:
r < PI
; ( arccot (cot . r) = r & arccot (cot r) = r )
A3:
dom (cot | ].0 ,PI .[) = ].0 ,PI .[
by Th2, RELAT_1:91;
A4:
r in ].0 ,PI .[
by A1, A2, XXREAL_1:4;
then arccot (cot . r) =
arccot . ((cot | ].0 ,PI .[) . r)
by FUNCT_1:72
.=
(id ].0 ,PI .[) . r
by A4, A3, Th32, FUNCT_1:23
.=
r
by A4, FUNCT_1:35
;
hence
( arccot (cot . r) = r & arccot (cot r) = r )
by A4, Th14; verum