let n be Nat; ( n > 1 implies n |^|^ omega = omega )
assume Z0:
n > 1
; n |^|^ omega = omega
deffunc H1( Ordinal) -> Ordinal = n |^|^ $1;
consider phi being Ordinal-Sequence such that
A1:
( dom phi = omega & ( for b being ordinal number st b in omega holds
phi . b = H1(b) ) )
from ORDINAL2:sch 3();
AA:
rng phi c= omega
A2:
n |^|^ omega = lim phi
by A1, Th2;
now thus
{} <> omega
;
for b, c being ordinal number st b in omega & omega in c holds
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom phi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom phi holds
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c ) ) )let b,
c be
ordinal number ;
( b in omega & omega in c implies ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom phi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom phi holds
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c ) ) ) )assume A3:
(
b in omega &
omega in c )
;
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom phi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom phi holds
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c ) ) )reconsider x =
b as
Element of
omega by A3;
take D =
n |^|^ x;
( D in dom phi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom phi holds
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c ) ) )thus
D in dom phi
by A1, ORDINAL1:def 13;
for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom phi holds
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c )
x < D
by Z0, ThA1;
then A4:
b in D
by NAT_1:45;
let E be
Ordinal;
( D c= E & E in dom phi implies ( b in phi . E & phi . E in c ) )assume A5:
(
D c= E &
E in dom phi )
;
( b in phi . E & phi . E in c )then reconsider e =
E as
Element of
omega by A1;
(
x < e &
e < n |^|^ e )
by Z0, ThA1, NAT_1:45, A4, A5;
then A6:
(
x < n |^|^ e &
phi . e = H1(
e) )
by A1, XXREAL_0:2;
phi . E in rng phi
by A5, FUNCT_1:def 5;
hence
(
b in phi . E &
phi . E in c )
by A3, A6, ORDINAL1:19, NAT_1:45, AA;
verum end;
then
omega is_limes_of phi
by ORDINAL2:def 13;
hence
n |^|^ omega = omega
by A2, ORDINAL2:def 14; verum