let K be Field; :: thesis: for n being Element of NAT
for A being Matrix of n,K st n >= 1 & A is diagonal holds
Det A = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)

let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: for A being Matrix of n,K st n >= 1 & A is diagonal holds
Det A = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)

let A be Matrix of n,K; :: thesis: ( n >= 1 & A is diagonal implies Det A = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) )
assume that
A1: n >= 1 and
A2: A is diagonal ; :: thesis: Det A = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
set k1 = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A);
set X = Permutations n;
set Y = the carrier of K;
reconsider p0 = idseq n as Permutation of (Seg n) ;
A3: len (diagonal_of_Matrix A) = n by MATRIX_3:def 10;
deffunc H1( set ) -> Element of the carrier of K = IFEQ (idseq n),$1,(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K);
A4: for x being set st x in Permutations n holds
H1(x) in the carrier of K ;
ex f2 being Function of (Permutations n),the carrier of K st
for x being set st x in Permutations n holds
f2 . x = H1(x) from FUNCT_2:sch 2(A4);
then consider f2 being Function of (Permutations n),the carrier of K such that
A5: for x being set st x in Permutations n holds
f2 . x = H1(x) ;
A6: p0 is even by MATRIX_2:29;
A7: for x being set st x in dom (Path_product A) holds
(Path_product A) . x = f2 . x
proof
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in dom (Path_product A) implies (Path_product A) . x = f2 . x )
assume x in dom (Path_product A) ; :: thesis: (Path_product A) . x = f2 . x
for p being Element of Permutations n holds f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p
proof
let p be Element of Permutations n; :: thesis: f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p
A8: now
per cases ( p is even or not p is even ) ;
suppose not p is even ; :: thesis: - (0. K),p = 0. K
then - (0. K),p = - (0. K) by MATRIX_2:def 16
.= 0. K by RLVECT_1:25 ;
hence - (0. K),p = 0. K ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
now
per cases ( p = idseq n or p <> idseq n ) ;
case A9: p = idseq n ; :: thesis: f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p
A10: for i, j being Nat st i in dom (diagonal_of_Matrix A) & j = p . i holds
(diagonal_of_Matrix A) . i = A * i,j
proof
let i, j be Nat; :: thesis: ( i in dom (diagonal_of_Matrix A) & j = p . i implies (diagonal_of_Matrix A) . i = A * i,j )
assume that
A11: i in dom (diagonal_of_Matrix A) and
A12: j = p . i ; :: thesis: (diagonal_of_Matrix A) . i = A * i,j
A13: i in Seg n by A3, A11, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then p . i = i by A9, FUNCT_1:34;
hence (diagonal_of_Matrix A) . i = A * i,j by A12, A13, MATRIX_3:def 10; :: thesis: verum
end;
len (Permutations n) = n by MATRIX_2:20;
then A14: - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p = the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A) by A6, A9, MATRIX_2:def 16;
f2 . p = H1(p) by A5
.= the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A9, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p by A3, A14, A10, MATRIX_3:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A15: p <> idseq n ; :: thesis: f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p
reconsider Ab = NAT as non empty set ;
defpred S1[ Element of NAT ] means ( $1 < n implies ex p3 being FinSequence of K st
( len p3 = $1 + 1 & p3 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 & ( for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < $1 + 1 & n3 < n holds
p3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (p3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) ) ) );
A16: rng (Path_matrix p,A) c= the carrier of K by FINSEQ_1:def 4;
A17: len (Path_matrix p,A) = n by MATRIX_3:def 7;
then 1 in Seg (len (Path_matrix p,A)) by A1;
then 1 in dom (Path_matrix p,A) by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 in rng (Path_matrix p,A) by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then reconsider d = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 as Element of K by A16;
reconsider q3 = <*d*> as FinSequence of K ;
A18: for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < 0 + 1 & n3 < n holds
q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by NAT_1:13;
A19: for k being Element of NAT st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
let k be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )
assume A20: S1[k] ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
now
per cases ( k + 1 < n or k + 1 >= n ) ;
case A21: k + 1 < n ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
then consider p3 being FinSequence of K such that
A22: len p3 = k + 1 and
A23: p3 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 and
A24: for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < k + 1 & n3 < n holds
p3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (p3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A20, NAT_1:12;
defpred S2[ set , set ] means ( ( $1 in Seg (k + 1) implies $2 = p3 . $1 ) & ( not $1 in Seg (k + 1) implies $2 = 0. K ) );
A25: for x being set st x in NAT holds
ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] )
proof
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in NAT implies ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] ) )

assume x in NAT ; :: thesis: ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] )

now
per cases ( x in Seg (k + 1) or not x in Seg (k + 1) ) ;
case A26: x in Seg (k + 1) ; :: thesis: ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] )

then reconsider nx = x as Element of NAT ;
nx in dom p3 by A22, A26, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A27: p3 . nx in rng p3 by FUNCT_1:def 5;
rng p3 c= the carrier of K by FINSEQ_1:def 4;
then reconsider s = p3 . nx as Element of K by A27;
( x in Seg (k + 1) implies s = p3 . x ) ;
hence ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] ) by A26; :: thesis: verum
end;
case not x in Seg (k + 1) ; :: thesis: ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] )

hence ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] ) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence ex y being set st
( y in the carrier of K & S2[x,y] ) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
ex f6 being Function of NAT ,the carrier of K st
for x being set st x in NAT holds
S2[x,f6 . x] from FUNCT_2:sch 1(A25);
then consider f6 being Function of NAT ,the carrier of K such that
A28: for x being set st x in NAT holds
S2[x,f6 . x] ;
( 1 <= (k + 1) + 1 & (k + 1) + 1 <= n ) by A21, NAT_1:12, NAT_1:13;
then (k + 1) + 1 in Seg (len (Path_matrix p,A)) by A17;
then (k + 1) + 1 in dom (Path_matrix p,A) by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ( rng (Path_matrix p,A) c= the carrier of K & (Path_matrix p,A) . ((k + 1) + 1) in rng (Path_matrix p,A) ) by FINSEQ_1:def 4, FUNCT_1:def 5;
then [(f6 . (k + 1)),((Path_matrix p,A) . ((k + 1) + 1))] in [:the carrier of K,the carrier of K:] by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
then reconsider e = the multF of K . (f6 . (k + 1)),((Path_matrix p,A) . ((k + 1) + 1)) as Element of K by FUNCT_2:7;
reconsider q3 = p3 ^ <*e*> as FinSequence of K ;
A29: len q3 = (len p3) + (len <*e*>) by FINSEQ_1:35
.= (k + 1) + 1 by A22, FINSEQ_1:57 ;
A30: for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < (k + 1) + 1 & n3 < n holds
q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
proof
let n3 be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( 0 <> n3 & n3 < (k + 1) + 1 & n3 < n implies q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) )
assume that
A31: 0 <> n3 and
A32: n3 < (k + 1) + 1 and
A33: n3 < n ; :: thesis: q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
now
per cases ( n3 < k + 1 or n3 >= k + 1 ) ;
case A34: n3 < k + 1 ; :: thesis: q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
then ( 1 <= n3 + 1 & n3 + 1 <= k + 1 ) by NAT_1:12, NAT_1:13;
then n3 + 1 in Seg (len p3) by A22;
then n3 + 1 in dom p3 by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A35: p3 . (n3 + 1) = q3 . (n3 + 1) by FINSEQ_1:def 7;
0 + 1 <= n3 by A31, NAT_1:13;
then n3 in Seg (len p3) by A22, A34;
then A36: n3 in dom p3 by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
p3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (p3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A24, A31, A33, A34;
hence q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A35, A36, FINSEQ_1:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A37: n3 >= k + 1 ; :: thesis: q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
A38: n3 + 1 <= (k + 1) + 1 by A32, NAT_1:13;
A39: n3 + 1 > k + 1 by A37, NAT_1:13;
then n3 + 1 >= (k + 1) + 1 by NAT_1:13;
then A40: n3 + 1 = (k + 1) + 1 by A38, XXREAL_0:1;
1 <= k + 1 by NAT_1:12;
then A41: k + 1 in Seg (k + 1) ;
then k + 1 in dom p3 by A22, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A42: q3 . (k + 1) = p3 . (k + 1) by FINSEQ_1:def 7;
q3 . (n3 + 1) = <*e*> . ((n3 + 1) - (k + 1)) by A22, A29, A39, A38, FINSEQ_1:37
.= e by A40, FINSEQ_1:def 8 ;
hence q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A28, A40, A41, A42; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence q3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (q3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
1 <= k + 1 by NAT_1:12;
then 1 in Seg (len p3) by A22;
then 1 in dom p3 by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then q3 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 by A23, FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence S1[k + 1] by A29, A30; :: thesis: verum
end;
case k + 1 >= n ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
hence S1[k + 1] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence S1[k + 1] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A43: f2 . p = H1(p) by A5
.= 0. K by A15, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
n < n + 1 by NAT_1:13;
then A44: n - 1 < (n + 1) - 1 by XREAL_1:16;
A45: dom p = Seg (len (Permutations n)) by FUNCT_2:67;
then A46: dom p = Seg n by MATRIX_2:20;
then dom p = dom (idseq n) by RELAT_1:71;
then consider i0 being set such that
A47: i0 in dom p and
A48: p . i0 <> (idseq n) . i0 by A15, FUNCT_1:9;
A49: i0 in Seg n by A45, A47, MATRIX_2:20;
reconsider i0 = i0 as Element of NAT by A45, A47;
A50: p . i0 <> i0 by A46, A47, A48, FUNCT_1:35;
p is Permutation of (Seg n) by MATRIX_2:def 11;
then A51: p . i0 in Seg n by A46, A47, FUNCT_2:7;
then reconsider j0 = p . i0 as Element of NAT ;
A52: n - 1 = n -' 1 by A1, XREAL_1:235;
( len q3 = 1 & q3 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 ) by FINSEQ_1:57;
then A53: S1[ 0 ] by A18;
for k being Element of NAT holds S1[k] from NAT_1:sch 1(A53, A19);
then consider p3 being FinSequence of K such that
A54: len p3 = (n -' 1) + 1 and
A55: p3 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 and
A56: for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < (n -' 1) + 1 & n3 < n holds
p3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (p3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A52, A44;
defpred S2[ set , set ] means ( ( $1 in Seg n implies $2 = p3 . $1 ) & ( not $1 in Seg n implies $2 = 0. K ) );
A57: for x3 being Element of Ab ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3]
proof
let x3 be Element of Ab; :: thesis: ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3]
now
per cases ( x3 in Seg n or not x3 in Seg n ) ;
case A58: x3 in Seg n ; :: thesis: ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3]
then x3 in dom p3 by A52, A54, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ( rng p3 c= the carrier of K & p3 . x3 in rng p3 ) by FINSEQ_1:def 4, FUNCT_1:def 5;
hence ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3] by A58; :: thesis: verum
end;
case not x3 in Seg n ; :: thesis: ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3]
hence ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence ex y3 being Element of K st S2[x3,y3] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
ex f4 being Function of Ab,the carrier of K st
for x2 being Element of Ab holds S2[x2,f4 . x2] from FUNCT_2:sch 3(A57);
then consider f4 being Function of NAT ,the carrier of K such that
A59: for x4 being Element of NAT holds
( ( x4 in Seg n implies f4 . x4 = p3 . x4 ) & ( not x4 in Seg n implies f4 . x4 = 0. K ) ) ;
A60: for n3 being Element of NAT st 0 <> n3 & n3 < len (Path_matrix p,A) holds
f4 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (f4 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
proof
let n3 be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( 0 <> n3 & n3 < len (Path_matrix p,A) implies f4 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (f4 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) )
assume that
A61: 0 <> n3 and
A62: n3 < len (Path_matrix p,A) ; :: thesis: f4 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (f4 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1))
A63: n3 + 1 <= len (Path_matrix p,A) by A62, NAT_1:13;
A64: 0 + 1 <= n3 by A61, NAT_1:13;
then A65: n3 in Seg n by A17, A62;
1 < n3 + 1 by A64, NAT_1:13;
then n3 + 1 in Seg n by A17, A63;
then A66: f4 . (n3 + 1) = p3 . (n3 + 1) by A59;
p3 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (p3 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A17, A52, A56, A61, A62;
hence f4 . (n3 + 1) = the multF of K . (f4 . n3),((Path_matrix p,A) . (n3 + 1)) by A59, A66, A65; :: thesis: verum
end;
A67: i0 <= n by A46, A47, FINSEQ_1:3;
then A68: n -' i0 = n - i0 by XREAL_1:235;
i0 in dom (Path_matrix p,A) by A49, A17, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A69: (Path_matrix p,A) . i0 = A * i0,j0 by MATRIX_3:def 7;
defpred S3[ Element of NAT ] means f4 . (i0 + $1) = 0. K;
A70: 0 < i0 by A45, A47, FINSEQ_1:3;
A71: for k being Element of NAT st S3[k] holds
S3[k + 1]
proof
let k be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( S3[k] implies S3[k + 1] )
A72: 1 <= 1 + (i0 + k) by NAT_1:12;
assume A73: S3[k] ; :: thesis: S3[k + 1]
now
per cases ( (i0 + k) + 1 <= n or (i0 + k) + 1 > n ) ;
case A74: (i0 + k) + 1 <= n ; :: thesis: S3[k + 1]
1 <= 1 + (i0 + k) by NAT_1:12;
then (i0 + k) + 1 in Seg (len (Path_matrix p,A)) by A17, A74;
then (i0 + k) + 1 in dom (Path_matrix p,A) by FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A75: (Path_matrix p,A) . ((i0 + k) + 1) in rng (Path_matrix p,A) by FUNCT_1:def 5;
rng (Path_matrix p,A) c= the carrier of K by FINSEQ_1:def 4;
then reconsider b = (Path_matrix p,A) . ((i0 + k) + 1) as Element of K by A75;
i0 <= i0 + k by NAT_1:12;
then A76: 0 < i0 + k by A45, A47, FINSEQ_1:3;
A77: i0 + k < n by A74, NAT_1:13;
0 + 1 <= i0 + k by A70, NAT_1:13;
then A78: i0 + k in Seg n by A77;
(i0 + k) + 1 in Seg n by A72, A74;
then f4 . ((i0 + k) + 1) = p3 . ((i0 + k) + 1) by A59
.= the multF of K . (p3 . (i0 + k)),((Path_matrix p,A) . ((i0 + k) + 1)) by A52, A56, A77, A76
.= (0. K) * b by A59, A73, A78
.= 0. K by VECTSP_1:36 ;
hence S3[k + 1] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
case (i0 + k) + 1 > n ; :: thesis: S3[k + 1]
then not i0 + (k + 1) in Seg n by FINSEQ_1:3;
hence S3[k + 1] by A59; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence S3[k + 1] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
1 in Seg n by A1;
then A79: f4 . 1 = (Path_matrix p,A) . 1 by A55, A59;
A80: 1 <= i0 by A45, A47, FINSEQ_1:3;
now
per cases ( i0 <= 1 or i0 > 1 ) ;
case A81: i0 > 1 ; :: thesis: S3[ 0 ]
reconsider a = f4 . (i0 -' 1) as Element of K ;
i0 < i0 + 1 by NAT_1:13;
then i0 - 1 < (i0 + 1) - 1 by XREAL_1:16;
then A82: i0 - 1 < len (Path_matrix p,A) by A67, A17, XXREAL_0:2;
i0 -' 1 = i0 - 1 by A81, XREAL_1:235;
then A83: (i0 -' 1) + 1 = i0 ;
i0 - 1 > 1 - 1 by A81, XREAL_1:16;
then f4 . i0 = the multF of K . (f4 . (i0 -' 1)),((Path_matrix p,A) . i0) by A60, A82, A83
.= a * (0. K) by A2, A49, A50, A51, A69, Def2
.= 0. K by VECTSP_1:36 ;
hence S3[ 0 ] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
then A84: S3[ 0 ] ;
for k being Element of NAT holds S3[k] from NAT_1:sch 1(A84, A71);
then S3[n -' i0] ;
hence f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p by A1, A8, A43, A17, A79, A60, A68, FINSOP_1:3; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence f2 . p = - (the multF of K $$ (Path_matrix p,A)),p ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence (Path_product A) . x = f2 . x by MATRIX_3:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
deffunc H2( set ) -> set = IFIN (idseq n),$1,(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K);
set F = the addF of K;
set f = Path_product A;
set B = FinOmega (Permutations n);
set F4 = diagonal_of_Matrix A;
A85: for x being set st x in Fin (Permutations n) holds
H2(x) in the carrier of K
proof
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in Fin (Permutations n) implies H2(x) in the carrier of K )
assume x in Fin (Permutations n) ; :: thesis: H2(x) in the carrier of K
per cases ( idseq n in x or not idseq n in x ) ;
suppose idseq n in x ; :: thesis: H2(x) in the carrier of K
end;
suppose not idseq n in x ; :: thesis: H2(x) in the carrier of K
then H2(x) = 0. K by Def1;
hence H2(x) in the carrier of K ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
ex f2 being Function of (Fin (Permutations n)),the carrier of K st
for x being set st x in Fin (Permutations n) holds
f2 . x = H2(x) from FUNCT_2:sch 2(A85);
then consider G0 being Function of (Fin (Permutations n)),the carrier of K such that
A86: for x being set st x in Fin (Permutations n) holds
G0 . x = H2(x) ;
dom f2 = Permutations n by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then A87: dom (Path_product A) = dom f2 by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then A88: Path_product A = f2 by A7, FUNCT_1:9;
A89: for B9 being Element of Fin (Permutations n) st B9 c= FinOmega (Permutations n) & B9 <> {} holds
for x being Element of Permutations n st x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 holds
G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x)
proof
let B9 be Element of Fin (Permutations n); :: thesis: ( B9 c= FinOmega (Permutations n) & B9 <> {} implies for x being Element of Permutations n st x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 holds
G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) )

assume that
B9 c= FinOmega (Permutations n) and
B9 <> {} ; :: thesis: for x being Element of Permutations n st x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 holds
G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x)

thus for x being Element of Permutations n st x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 holds
G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) :: thesis: verum
proof
let x be Element of Permutations n; :: thesis: ( x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 implies G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) )
assume A90: x in (FinOmega (Permutations n)) \ B9 ; :: thesis: G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x)
A91: now
assume A92: not idseq n in B9 \/ {x} ; :: thesis: G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = 0. K
thus G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = IFIN (idseq n),(B9 \/ {.x.}),(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) by A86
.= 0. K by A92, Def1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A93: 0. K is_a_unity_wrt the addF of K by FVSUM_1:8;
A94: now
assume A95: not idseq n in B9 ; :: thesis: G0 . B9 = 0. K
thus G0 . B9 = IFIN (idseq n),B9,(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) by A86
.= 0. K by A95, Def1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A96: now
assume A97: not idseq n in B9 \/ {x} ; :: thesis: the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = 0. K
then not idseq n in {x} by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then A98: not idseq n = x by TARSKI:def 1;
(Path_product A) . x = H1(x) by A5, A88
.= 0. K by A98, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = 0. K by A94, A93, A97, BINOP_1:11, XBOOLE_0:def 3; :: thesis: verum
end;
A99: now
assume A100: idseq n in B9 ; :: thesis: G0 . B9 = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
thus G0 . B9 = IFIN (idseq n),B9,(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) by A86
.= the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A100, Def1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A101: now
assume idseq n in B9 \/ {x} ; :: thesis: the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
then A102: ( idseq n in B9 or idseq n in {x} ) by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
now
per cases ( idseq n in B9 or idseq n = x ) by A102, TARSKI:def 1;
case A103: idseq n in B9 ; :: thesis: the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
A104: not x in B9 by A90, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
(Path_product A) . x = H1(x) by A5, A88
.= 0. K by A103, A104, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A99, A93, A103, BINOP_1:11; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A105: idseq n = x ; :: thesis: the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
(Path_product A) . x = H1(x) by A5, A88
.= the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A105, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A90, A94, A93, A105, BINOP_1:11, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
now
assume A106: idseq n in B9 \/ {x} ; :: thesis: G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)
thus G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = IFIN (idseq n),(B9 \/ {.x.}),(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) by A86
.= the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A106, Def1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence G0 . (B9 \/ {x}) = the addF of K . (G0 . B9),((Path_product A) . x) by A91, A101, A96; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
A107: for x being Element of Permutations n holds G0 . {x} = (Path_product A) . x
proof
let x be Element of Permutations n; :: thesis: G0 . {x} = (Path_product A) . x
now
per cases ( x = idseq n or x <> idseq n ) ;
case A108: x = idseq n ; :: thesis: G0 . {.x.} = f2 . x
then idseq n in {x} by TARSKI:def 1;
then A109: IFIN (idseq n),{x},(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by Def1;
f2 . x = H1(x) by A5
.= the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A108, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence G0 . {.x.} = f2 . x by A86, A109; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A110: x <> idseq n ; :: thesis: G0 . {.x.} = f2 . x
then not idseq n in {x} by TARSKI:def 1;
then A111: IFIN (idseq n),{x},(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) = 0. K by Def1;
f2 . x = H1(x) by A5
.= 0. K by A110, FUNCOP_1:def 8 ;
hence G0 . {.x.} = f2 . x by A86, A111; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence G0 . {x} = (Path_product A) . x by A87, A7, FUNCT_1:9; :: thesis: verum
end;
A112: for e being Element of the carrier of K st e is_a_unity_wrt the addF of K holds
G0 . {} = e
proof
let e be Element of the carrier of K; :: thesis: ( e is_a_unity_wrt the addF of K implies G0 . {} = e )
assume e is_a_unity_wrt the addF of K ; :: thesis: G0 . {} = e
then A113: the addF of K . (0. K),e = 0. K by BINOP_1:11;
0. K is_a_unity_wrt the addF of K by FVSUM_1:8;
then A114: the addF of K . (0. K),e = e by BINOP_1:11;
IFIN (idseq n),{} ,(the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A)),(0. K) = 0. K by Def1;
hence G0 . {} = e by A86, A113, A114, FINSUB_1:18; :: thesis: verum
end;
A115: now end;
idseq n is Element of (Group_of_Perm n) by MATRIX_2:23;
then ( FinOmega (Permutations n) = Permutations n & idseq n in the carrier of (Group_of_Perm n) ) by MATRIX_2:30, MATRIX_2:def 17;
then the addF of K $$ (FinOmega (Permutations n)),(Path_product A) = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by A115, A112, A107, A89, MATRIX_2:def 13, SETWISEO:def 3;
hence Det A = the multF of K $$ (diagonal_of_Matrix A) by MATRIX_3:def 9; :: thesis: verum