let Omega be non empty set ; :: thesis: for X being Subset-Family of Omega st X = {} holds
sigma X = {{} ,Omega}

let X be Subset-Family of Omega; :: thesis: ( X = {} implies sigma X = {{} ,Omega} )
A1: for A1 being SetSequence of Omega st rng A1 c= {{} ,Omega} holds
Union A1 in {{} ,Omega}
proof
let A1 be SetSequence of Omega; :: thesis: ( rng A1 c= {{} ,Omega} implies Union A1 in {{} ,Omega} )
assume A2: rng A1 c= {{} ,Omega} ; :: thesis: Union A1 in {{} ,Omega}
A3: for n being Element of NAT holds
( (Partial_Union A1) . n = {} or (Partial_Union A1) . n = Omega )
proof
defpred S1[ Nat] means ( (Partial_Union A1) . $1 = {} or (Partial_Union A1) . $1 = Omega );
let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( (Partial_Union A1) . n = {} or (Partial_Union A1) . n = Omega )
A4: for k being Nat st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
let k be Nat; :: thesis: ( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )
assume A5: ( (Partial_Union A1) . k = {} or (Partial_Union A1) . k = Omega ) ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
reconsider k = k as Element of NAT by ORDINAL1:def 13;
A6: A1 . (k + 1) in rng A1 by NAT_1:52;
per cases ( (Partial_Union A1) . (k + 1) = {} \/ (A1 . (k + 1)) or (Partial_Union A1) . (k + 1) = Omega \/ (A1 . (k + 1)) ) by A5, PROB_3:def 2;
suppose (Partial_Union A1) . (k + 1) = {} \/ (A1 . (k + 1)) ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
hence S1[k + 1] by A2, A6, TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose A7: (Partial_Union A1) . (k + 1) = Omega \/ (A1 . (k + 1)) ; :: thesis: S1[k + 1]
( A1 . (k + 1) = {} or A1 . (k + 1) = Omega ) by A2, A6, TARSKI:def 2;
hence S1[k + 1] by A7; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
( (Partial_Union A1) . 0 = A1 . 0 & A1 . 0 in rng A1 ) by NAT_1:52, PROB_3:def 2;
then A8: S1[ 0 ] by A2, TARSKI:def 2;
for k being Nat holds S1[k] from NAT_1:sch 2(A8, A4);
hence ( (Partial_Union A1) . n = {} or (Partial_Union A1) . n = Omega ) ; :: thesis: verum
end;
( Union (Partial_Union A1) = {} or Union (Partial_Union A1) = Omega )
proof end;
then ( Union A1 = {} or Union A1 = Omega ) by PROB_3:17;
hence Union A1 in {{} ,Omega} by TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
A11: for A being Subset of Omega st A in {{} ,Omega} holds
A ` in {{} ,Omega}
proof
let A be Subset of Omega; :: thesis: ( A in {{} ,Omega} implies A ` in {{} ,Omega} )
assume A in {{} ,Omega} ; :: thesis: A ` in {{} ,Omega}
then ( A = {} or A = Omega ) by TARSKI:def 2;
then ( A ` = Omega or A ` = {} ) by XBOOLE_1:37;
hence A ` in {{} ,Omega} by TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
( {} in sigma X & Omega in sigma X ) by PROB_1:10, PROB_1:11;
then for x being set st x in {{} ,Omega} holds
x in sigma X by TARSKI:def 2;
then A12: {{} ,Omega} c= sigma X by TARSKI:def 3;
assume X = {} ; :: thesis: sigma X = {{} ,Omega}
then A13: X c= {{} ,Omega} by XBOOLE_1:2;
for x being set st x in {{} ,Omega} holds
x in bool Omega
proof
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in {{} ,Omega} implies x in bool Omega )
assume x in {{} ,Omega} ; :: thesis: x in bool Omega
then ( x = {} or x = Omega ) by TARSKI:def 2;
then x c= Omega by XBOOLE_1:2;
hence x in bool Omega ; :: thesis: verum
end;
then {{} ,Omega} is SigmaField of Omega by A1, A11, PROB_4:5, TARSKI:def 3;
then sigma X c= {{} ,Omega} by A13, PROB_1:def 14;
hence sigma X = {{} ,Omega} by A12, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum